Andrea Necchi, Andrea Anichini, Daniele Raggi, Simona Massa, Maurizio Colecchia, Patrizia Giannatempo, Roberta Mortarini, Elena Farè, Francesco Monopoli, Antonella Messina, Roberto Salvioni, and Luigi Mariani, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; Alberto Briganti, Roberta Lucianò, Marco Bianchi, Renzo Colombo, Andrea Gallina, Andrea Salonia, and Francesco Montorsi, Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Siraj M. Ali, Russell Madison, Jeffrey S. Ross, and Jon H. Chung, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Jeffrey S. Ross, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;36(34):3353-3360. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01148. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
To determine the activity of pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant immunotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) for which standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy is poorly used.
In the PURE-01 study, patients had a predominant urothelial carcinoma histology and clinical (c)T≤3bN0 stage tumor. They received three cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks before RC. The primary end point in the intention-to-treat population was pathologic complete response (pT0). Biomarker analyses included programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using the combined positive score (CPS; Dako 22C3 pharmDx assay), genomic sequencing (FoundationONE assay), and an immune gene expression assay.
Fifty patients were enrolled from February 2017 to March 2018. Twenty-seven patients (54%) had cT3 tumor, 21 (42%) cT2 tumor, and two (4%) cT2-3N1 tumor. One patient (2%) experienced a grade 3 transaminase increase and discontinued pembrolizumab. All patients underwent RC; there were 21 patients with pT0 (42%; 95% CI, 28.2% to 56.8%). As a secondary end point, downstaging to pT<2 was achieved in 27 patients (54%; 95% CI, 39.3% to 68.2%). In 54.3% of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10% (n = 35), RC indicated pT0, whereas RC indicated pT0 in only 13.3% of those with CPS < 10% (n = 15). A significant nonlinear association between tumor mutation burden (TMB) and pT0 was observed, with a cutoff at 15 mutations/Mb. Expression of several genes in pretherapy lesions was significantly different between pT0 and non-pT0 cohorts. Significant post-therapy changes in the TMB and evidence of adaptive mechanisms of immune resistance were observed in residual tumors.
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in 42% of patients with pT0 and was safely administered in patients with MIBC. This study indicates that pembrolizumab could be a worthwhile neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of MIBC when limited to patients with PD-L1-positive or high-TMB tumors.
评估帕博利珠单抗作为新辅助免疫疗法在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)前治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的疗效,MIBC 患者对标准顺铂类化疗反应不佳。
在 PURE-01 研究中,患者的主要组织学类型为尿路上皮癌,且临床(c)T≤3bN0 期肿瘤。患者在 RC 前接受三个周期的 200mg 帕博利珠单抗每 3 周一次的治疗。在意向治疗人群中,主要终点为病理完全缓解(pT0)。生物标志物分析包括使用组合阳性评分(CPS;Dako 22C3 pharmDx 检测)评估程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达、基因组测序(FoundationONE 检测)和免疫基因表达检测。
2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 3 月共招募了 50 名患者。27 名患者(54%)的肿瘤为 cT3 期,21 名(42%)为 cT2 期,2 名(4%)为 cT2-3N1 期。1 名患者(2%)出现 3 级转氨酶升高并停止使用帕博利珠单抗。所有患者均接受了 RC;21 名患者(42%;95%CI,28.2%至 56.8%)达到 pT0。作为次要终点,27 名患者(54%;95%CI,39.3%至 68.2%)降期为 pT<2。在 PD-L1 CPS≥10%(n=35)的 54.3%患者中,RC 结果为 pT0,而 CPS<10%(n=15)的患者中仅 13.3%为 pT0。观察到肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)与 pT0 之间存在显著的非线性关联,截断值为 15 个突变/Mb。pT0 患者和非 pT0 患者的术前病变中存在几个基因的表达存在显著差异。在残余肿瘤中观察到 TMB 的显著治疗后变化和免疫抵抗的适应性机制的证据。
新辅助帕博利珠单抗治疗 MIBC 的患者,42%的患者达到 pT0,且安全性良好。该研究表明,在 PD-L1 阳性或高 TMB 肿瘤患者中,帕博利珠单抗可能是 MIBC 有价值的新辅助治疗药物。