Suppr超能文献

新辅助帕博利珠单抗对比顺铂为基础的化疗或直接根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的疗效比较。

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.008. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent progresses in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have challenged the therapeutic standards in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare neoadjuvant pembrolizumab followed by radical cystectomy (RC) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC or upfront RC, according to cisplatin eligibility.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted two separate analyses for cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible cT2-4N0M0 MIBC patients. We used a propensity score adjustment that relied on inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW).

INTERVENTION

Pembrolizumab within the PURE-01 trial, and NAC and RC or upfront RC from a high-volume tertiary care referral center.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint in both analyses was event-free survival (EFS), defined as freedom from recurrence, and/or death from any cause indexed from the date of treatment initiation or RC. The secondary endpoints included EFS in propensity score-matched patients, pathologic response rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 458 patients who underwent RC, with or without NAC, at Moffitt Cancer Center between October 2005 and October 2020, and 146 patients enrolled in PURE-01 were analyzed. In cisplatin-ineligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.5-95.2) for pembrolizumab and RC, and 36.1% (95% CI: 28.6-45.5) for upfront RC. EFS remained superior in those receiving neoadjuvant ICI (NICI) following IPTW (p < 0.001). In cisplatin-eligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab and RC (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 86.9% (95% CI: 80.9-93.3) for pembrolizumab and 63.5% (95% CI: 56.5-71.4) for NAC. EFS remained superior in those receiving NICI following IPTW (p < 0.001). Pathologic responses and RFS in pembrolizumab-treated patients were also superior to those in NAC-treated patients. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first ever reported comprehensive comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant ICI and NAC, followed by RC, or upfront RC, we report increased responses and improved oncologic outcomes with neoadjuvant ICI in patients with MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared the results obtained from the use of pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy with standard-of-care treatments in patients with bladder carcinoma infiltrating the muscle layer. We reported increased response and survival rates possibilities with the use of immunotherapy, anticipating the possibility to set new therapeutic standards in these patients, pending the results of ongoing randomized studies.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的应用最近取得了进展,这对肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的治疗标准提出了挑战。

目的

根据顺铂的适用性,比较新辅助派姆单抗治疗后行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)与新辅助化疗(NAC)和 RC 或 upfront RC。

设计、设置和参与者:我们为顺铂适用和不适用的 cT2-4N0M0 MIBC 患者分别进行了两项独立分析。我们使用了基于逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)的倾向评分调整。

干预措施

PURE-01 试验中的派姆单抗和高容量三级转诊中心的 NAC 和 RC 或 upfront RC。

结局测量和统计分析

这两项分析的主要终点均为无事件生存(EFS),定义为从治疗开始或 RC 日期起无复发和/或任何原因导致的死亡。次要终点包括倾向评分匹配患者的 EFS、病理反应率和 RC 后的无复发生存(RFS)。

结果和局限性

2005 年 10 月至 2020 年 10 月期间,在 Moffitt 癌症中心接受 RC 治疗的患者共 458 例,其中接受或未接受 NAC,以及 146 例参加 PURE-01 的患者进行了分析。在顺铂不适用的患者中,接受派姆单抗治疗的患者 EFS 更优(p<0.001)。估计的 3 年 EFS 为派姆单抗和 RC 组的 77.8%(95%置信区间[CI]:63.5-95.2), upfront RC 组的 36.1%(95% CI:28.6-45.5)。接受新辅助 ICI(NICI)治疗后,EFS 在 IPTW 中仍然更优(p<0.001)。在顺铂适用的患者中,接受派姆单抗和 RC 治疗的患者 EFS 更优(p<0.001)。估计的 3 年 EFS 为派姆单抗组为 86.9%(95% CI:80.9-93.3),NAC 组为 63.5%(95% CI:56.5-71.4)。接受 NICI 治疗后,EFS 在 IPTW 中仍然更优(p<0.001)。接受派姆单抗治疗的患者的病理反应率和 RFS 也优于接受 NAC 治疗的患者。结果受到研究回顾性的限制。

结论

在首次对新辅助 ICI 和 NAC 与 RC 或 upfront RC 后结果进行的综合比较中,我们报告了在 MIBC 患者中使用新辅助 ICI 可提高反应率和改善肿瘤学结局。

患者总结

我们比较了派姆单抗和根治性膀胱切除术与膀胱癌浸润肌层患者标准治疗的结果。我们报告了免疫治疗的反应和生存可能性增加,期待在正在进行的随机研究结果的基础上,为这些患者设定新的治疗标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验