• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的干预措施以减少苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的不适当处方和使用:一项系统评价

Patient-centered care interventions to reduce the inappropriate prescription and use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs: a systematic review.

作者信息

Mokhar Aliaksandra, Topp Janine, Härter Martin, Schulz Holger, Kuhn Silke, Verthein Uwe, Dirmaier Jörg

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Oct 8;6:e5535. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5535. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.5535
PMID:30345166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6190800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and z-drugs are effective drugs, but they are prescribed excessively worldwide. International guidelines recommend a maximum treatment duration of 4 weeks. Although these drugs are effective in the short-term, long-term BZD therapy is associated with considerable adverse effects, the development of tolerance and, finally, addiction. However, there are different interventions in terms of patient-centered care that aim to reduce the use of BZDs and z-drugs as well as assist health care professionals (HCPs) in preventing the inappropriate prescription of BZDs.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to identify interventions that promote patient-centered treatments for inappropriate BZD and z-drug use and to analyze their effectiveness in reducing the inappropriate use of these drugs.

METHODS

To identify relevant studies, the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Psyndex, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies with controlled designs focusing on adult patients were included. Trials with chronically or mentally ill patients were excluded if long-term BZD and z-drug use was indicated. Study extraction was performed based on the Cochrane Form for study extraction. To assess the quality of the studies, we used a tool based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials.

RESULTS

We identified 7,068 studies and selected 20 for systematic review. Nine interventions focused on patients, nine on HCPs, and two on both patients and HCPs. Intervention types ranged from simple to multifaceted. Patient-centered interventions that provided patient information effectively increased the appropriate use of BZDs. The educational approaches for HCPs that aimed to achieve appropriate prescription reported inconsistent results. The methods that combined informing patients and HCPs led to a significant reduction in BZD use.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first review of studies focused on patient-centered approaches to reducing the inappropriate prescription and use of BZDs and z-drugs. The patient-centered dimension of patient information was responsible for a decrease in BZD and z-drug consumption. Further, in some studies, the patient-centered dimensions responsible for reducing the prescription and use of BZDs and z-drugs were the clinician's essential characteristics and clinician-patient communication.

摘要

背景

苯二氮䓬类药物(BZDs)和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物是有效的药物,但在全球范围内都存在过度处方的情况。国际指南建议最大治疗时长为4周。尽管这些药物在短期内有效,但长期使用BZD治疗会带来相当多的不良反应、产生耐受性并最终导致成瘾。然而,在以患者为中心的护理方面有不同的干预措施,旨在减少BZDs和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物的使用,并协助医护人员(HCPs)防止不适当的BZD处方。

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定促进以患者为中心治疗不适当使用BZD和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物的干预措施,并分析其在减少这些药物不适当使用方面的有效性。

方法

为了确定相关研究,检索了PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Psyndex和Cochrane图书馆数据库。纳入以成年患者为重点的对照设计研究。如果表明存在长期使用BZD和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物的情况,则排除患有慢性病或精神疾病患者的试验。基于Cochrane研究提取表进行研究提取。为了评估研究质量,我们使用了一种基于Cochrane协作网用于评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。

结果

我们识别出7068项研究,并选择了20项进行系统评价。9项干预措施侧重于患者,9项侧重于医护人员,2项同时侧重于患者和医护人员。干预类型从简单到多方面不等。有效提供患者信息的以患者为中心的干预措施有效增加了BZDs的合理使用。旨在实现适当处方的针对医护人员的教育方法报告的结果不一致。将告知患者和医护人员相结合的方法导致BZD使用显著减少。

结论

这是首次对专注于以患者为中心方法减少BZD和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物不适当处方和使用的研究进行的综述。患者信息的以患者为中心维度导致了BZD和非苯二氮䓬类助眠药物消费的减少。此外,在一些研究中,负责减少BZD处方和使用的以患者为中心维度是临床医生的基本特征和医患沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8714/6190800/a24c7b23e279/peerj-06-5535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8714/6190800/a24c7b23e279/peerj-06-5535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8714/6190800/a24c7b23e279/peerj-06-5535-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-centered care interventions to reduce the inappropriate prescription and use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs: a systematic review.以患者为中心的干预措施以减少苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的不适当处方和使用:一项系统评价
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 8;6:e5535. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5535. eCollection 2018.
2
Trends in the consumption rates of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the health region of Lleida from 2002 to 2015.2002 年至 2015 年莱里达卫生区苯二氮䓬类药物和苯二氮䓬类相关药物消费率的变化趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08984-z.
3
Deprescribing of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs amongst the psychiatric patients of a tertiary care Hospital.三等级医院精神科患者苯二氮䓬类和 Z 类药物的减药/停药。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Aug;44:189-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.07.041. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
The prevalence and prescribing patterns of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in older nursing home residents in different European countries and Israel: retrospective results from the EU SHELTER study.不同欧洲国家和以色列老年疗养院居民中苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类药物的流行情况和处方模式:来自欧盟 SHELTER 研究的回顾性结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02213-x.
5
Real-world prescribing patterns of long-acting benzodiazepines for elderly Koreans in 2013
.2013年韩国老年人长效苯二氮䓬类药物的真实处方模式
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jun;55(6):472-479. doi: 10.5414/CP202974.
6
Evaluation of a multicomponent intervention consisting of education and feedback to reduce benzodiazepine prescriptions by general practitioners: The BENZORED hybrid type 1 cluster randomized controlled trial.评估由教育和反馈组成的多组分干预措施,以减少全科医生开具苯二氮䓬类药物的处方:BENZORED 混合 1 型集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 6;19(5):e1003983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003983. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Potentially inappropriate use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs in the older population-analysis of associations between long-term use and patient-related factors.老年人群中苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的潜在不适当使用——长期使用与患者相关因素之间的关联分析
PeerJ. 2018 May 22;6:e4614. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4614. eCollection 2018.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Minimal interventions to decrease long-term use of benzodiazepines in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.最小干预措施以减少初级保健中长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Sep;61(590):e573-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X593857.
10
Benzodiazepines, z-Hypnotics, and Risk of Dementia: Special Considerations of Half-Lives and Concomitant Use.苯二氮䓬类药物、z-催眠药和痴呆风险:半衰期和伴随使用的特殊考虑。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jan;17(1):156-164. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00801-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonists use in Belgium: a policy Delphi.比利时长期使用苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂的一级、二级和三级预防:一项德尔菲政策研究
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jun 23;83(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01580-w.
2
Comparative effectiveness of interventions to facilitate deprescription of benzodiazepines and other sedative hypnotics: systematic review and meta-analysis.促进苯二氮䓬类药物及其他镇静催眠药减药的干预措施的比较效果:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2025 Jun 17;389:e081336. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081336.
3
Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Which Dimensions of Patient-Centeredness Matter? - Results of a Web-Based Expert Delphi Survey.以患者为中心的哪些维度至关重要?——基于网络的专家德尔菲调查结果
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141978. eCollection 2015.
2
Exposure to benzodiazepines (anxiolytics, hypnotics and related drugs) in seven European electronic healthcare databases: a cross-national descriptive study from the PROTECT-EU Project.欧洲七个电子医疗数据库中苯二氮䓬类药物(抗焦虑药、催眠药及相关药物)的暴露情况:来自PROTECT-EU项目的一项跨国描述性研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;25 Suppl 1:56-65. doi: 10.1002/pds.3825. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
3
低价值医疗实践去实施化的效果:系统评价概述。
Implement Sci. 2024 Aug 5;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6.
4
Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians.评价模拟培训对低年资医生为老年患者开具高危药物处方的影响的实用临床试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 May;72(5):1420-1430. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18862. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
Feasibility of Identifying Factors Related to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia in Real-World Data.在真实世界数据中识别与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症相关因素的可行性
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 13:2024.02.10.24302621. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.10.24302621.
6
Professionals' treatment goals for long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drugs management: a qualitative study.专业人员对长期苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物管理的治疗目标:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0034. Print 2024 Apr.
7
Evaluation of a multicomponent intervention consisting of education and feedback to reduce benzodiazepine prescriptions by general practitioners: The BENZORED hybrid type 1 cluster randomized controlled trial.评估由教育和反馈组成的多组分干预措施,以减少全科医生开具苯二氮䓬类药物的处方:BENZORED 混合 1 型集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 6;19(5):e1003983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003983. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Effectiveness and utility of an electronic intervention for appropriate benzodiazepine and Z-drugs prescription in psychiatric clinics: protocol for a multicentric, real-world randomised controlled trial in China.电子干预措施在精神科门诊中合理开具苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类药物的有效性和实用性:在中国进行的一项多中心、真实世界、随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):e055341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055341.
9
Role of the prescriber in supporting patients to discontinue benzodiazepines: a qualitative study.医生在帮助患者停用苯二氮䓬类药物方面的作用:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e517-e527. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1062. Print 2021 Jul.
An integrative model of patient-centeredness - a systematic review and concept analysis.
以患者为中心的综合模型——系统评价与概念分析
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 17;9(9):e107828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107828. eCollection 2014.
4
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3.
5
Reduction of inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions among older adults through direct patient education: the EMPOWER cluster randomized trial.通过直接对患者进行教育减少老年人中不适当的苯二氮䓬类药物处方:EMPOWER 集群随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):890-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.949.
6
Comparative efficacy of two interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.两种干预措施在停止长期苯二氮䓬类药物使用方面的比较效果:初级保健中的集群随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;204(6):471-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.134650. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
7
Interventions for reducing benzodiazepine use in older people: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.干预措施减少苯二氮䓬类药物在老年人中的使用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;204(2):98-107. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126003.
8
Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.通过共同决策改善医疗服务并降低成本。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
9
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
10
Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.以患者为中心的护理与结局:文献系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Aug;70(4):351-79. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774. Epub 2012 Nov 20.