Department of Social Psychology, University of Geneva.
Department of Social Psychology, University Paris Nanterre.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Sep;25(3):477-490. doi: 10.1037/xap0000196. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Regulatory focus (Higgins, 1997) and self-determination (Deci & Ryan, 2000) are two motivation theories widely applied in health-intervention research but never conjointly, despite sharing a number of theoretical similarities. In three studies (N = 578), we investigated how university students' self-determination motives to act upon their nutrition interact with induced regulatory focus and regulatory-message framing to predict their behaviors or intentions to improve their eating habits. Results revealed a fit between extrinsic motives and prevention focus: Intention increased with extrinsic motives in a prevention but not a promotion focus. The effect of intrinsic motives, however, was independent of the focus, which suggests that these motives drive intention and behavior independently of external cues. Hence, the results advocate for simultaneously taking into consideration self-determination and regulatory focus when planning a health intervention relying on motivation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
调节焦点(Higgins,1997)和自我决定(Deci & Ryan,2000)是两种广泛应用于健康干预研究的动机理论,但尽管它们有许多理论上的相似之处,却从未同时应用过。在三项研究中(N=578),我们调查了大学生在营养方面采取行动的自我决定动机如何与诱导的调节焦点和调节信息框架相互作用,以预测他们改善饮食习惯的行为或意图。结果表明,外在动机与预防焦点之间存在契合:在预防焦点下,意图随着外在动机的增加而增加,而在促进焦点下则不然。然而,内在动机的效果则独立于焦点,这表明这些动机独立于外部线索驱动意图和行为。因此,这些结果提倡在规划依赖动机的健康干预措施时,同时考虑自我决定和调节焦点。(APA 心理学数据库记录(c)2019,保留所有权利)。