Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Brain Res. 2019 Mar 1;1706:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
Recent research has shown a relationship between reading and attention, however the neuroanatomical overlap of these two processes has remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, we sought to investigate the overlapping neural mechanisms of spatial attention and reading using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants performed two attentional orienting tasks (reflexive and voluntary), and two overt word-reading tasks (lexical and sublexical). We hypothesized that there would be greater unique activation overlap of reflexive attention with lexical reading, and of voluntary attention with sublexical reading. Results indicated that lexical reading had greater overlapping activation in reflexive orienting areas compared to sublexical reading, suggesting that lexical reading may employ more automatic attentional mechanisms. In contrast, sublexical reading had greater overlapping activation with voluntary attention areas compared to lexical reading, suggesting that phonetic decoding may rely more heavily on voluntary attention. This research broadens our understanding of the neural overlap that underlies the relationship between reading and spatial attention.
最近的研究表明阅读和注意力之间存在关系,但这两个过程的神经解剖重叠仍然相对未被探索。因此,我们试图使用功能磁共振成像研究空间注意力和阅读的重叠神经机制。参与者执行了两个注意导向任务(反射性和自愿性)和两个明显的单词阅读任务(词汇和次词汇)。我们假设反射性注意力与词汇阅读的独特激活重叠会更大,而自愿性注意力与次词汇阅读的独特激活重叠会更大。结果表明,与次词汇阅读相比,词汇阅读在反射性定向区域具有更大的重叠激活,这表明词汇阅读可能采用更多的自动注意机制。相比之下,与词汇阅读相比,次词汇阅读在自愿性注意区域具有更大的重叠激活,这表明语音解码可能更依赖于自愿性注意。这项研究拓宽了我们对阅读和空间注意力之间关系的神经重叠的理解。