Department of Respiratory Medicine, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, 56 Okazawa-cho, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, 240-8555, Japan.
Department of Medical Oncology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, 56 Okazawa-cho, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, 240-8555, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4911-7.
Compared with standard chemotherapy, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are more effective in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, data comparing the efficacies of different EGFR-TKIs, especially regarding the presence of brain metastasis, are lacking.
EGFR-TKI naive patients with recurrent or stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, excluding resistance mutations, were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively determined progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test in patients treated with either gefitinib or erlotinib, cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression using the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model, and favorable prognostic factors for CNS progression by multivariate analysis.
Seventy-seven EGFR-TKI-naive patients were started on either gefitinib (n = 55) or erlotinib (n = 22) in our hospital from April 2010 to April 2016. Among the patients with brain metastasis, PFS tended to be longer in the erlotinib than in the gefitinib group. In the analysis of cumulative incidence, the probability of CNS progression was lower in the erlotinib group than in the gefitinib group. Particularly, in a subgroup analysis of the patients with brain metastasis, there was a significant difference between the erlotinib and gefitinib groups (hazard ratio 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.81; p = 0.021). Of the prognostic factors for CNS progression evaluated, the absence of brain metastasis before EGFR-TKI therapy and receiving erlotinib (vs gefitinib) had a significantly favorable effect on patient prognosis.
Although this was a retrospective analysis involving a small sample size, erlotinib is potentially more promising than gefitinib for treatment of brain metastasis in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
与标准化疗相比,表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)在携带 EGFR 突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中更有效。然而,缺乏比较不同 EGFR-TKI 疗效的数据,特别是关于脑转移的存在。
本研究纳入了 EGFR-TKI 初治、携带 EGFR 突变(排除耐药突变)的复发性或 IIIB/IV 期 NSCLC 患者。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验来回顾性确定接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS),使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归模型来确定中枢神经系统(CNS)进展的累积发生率,并使用多变量分析来确定 CNS 进展的有利预后因素。
2010 年 4 月至 2016 年 4 月,我院共有 77 例 EGFR-TKI 初治患者开始使用吉非替尼(n=55)或厄洛替尼(n=22)。在有脑转移的患者中,厄洛替尼组的 PFS 似乎长于吉非替尼组。在累积发生率分析中,厄洛替尼组 CNS 进展的概率低于吉非替尼组。特别是在脑转移患者的亚组分析中,厄洛替尼组和吉非替尼组之间存在显著差异(风险比 0.25;95%置信区间,0.08-0.81;p=0.021)。在评估的 CNS 进展预后因素中,EGFR-TKI 治疗前无脑转移和接受厄洛替尼(与吉非替尼相比)对患者预后有显著的有利影响。
尽管这是一项回顾性分析,样本量较小,但厄洛替尼在治疗携带 EGFR 突变的 NSCLC 脑转移患者方面可能比吉非替尼更有前途。