Research Program on Public and International Engagement for Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-1266, USA.
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2334-2.
The use of herbal medicines in developing countries has been increasing over the years. In Ghana, since 2011, the government has been piloting the integration of herbal medicine in 17 public hospitals. However, the strengths and the weaknesses of the integration have not been fully explored. The current study sought to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the integration using the WHO health systems framework.
This study used qualitative, exploratory study design involving interviews of 25 key informants. The respondents had experience in conducting herbal medicine research. Two key informants were medical herbalists practising in hospitals piloting the integration in Ghana. We used Framework analysis to identify the perspectives of key informants in regards to the integration. RESULTS: Key informants mostly support the integration although some noted that the government needs to support scale-up in other public hospitals. Among the strengths cited were the employment of medical herbalists, utilization of traditional knowledge, research opportunities, and efficient service delivery by restricting the prescription and use of fake herbal medicine. The weaknesses were the lack of government policies on implementing the integration, financial challenges because the National Health Insurance Scheme does not cover herbal medicine, poor advocacy and research opportunities, and lack of training of conventional health practitioners in herbal medicine.
Researchers view the integration of the two healthcare systems-biomedicine, and herbal medicine- positively but it has challenges that need to be addressed. The integration could offer more opportunities for researching into herbal medicine. More training for conventional health professionals in herbal medicine could increase the chances of better coordination between the two units. Additionally, strong advocacy and publicity is needed to educate more people on the integration and the utilization of the services.
近年来,发展中国家对草药的使用呈上升趋势。在加纳,自 2011 年以来,政府一直在 17 家公立医院试行将草药纳入其中。然而,整合的优势和劣势尚未得到充分探索。本研究旨在利用世界卫生组织卫生系统框架来检查整合的优势和劣势。
本研究采用定性、探索性研究设计,对 25 名关键知情人进行了访谈。受访者在进行草药研究方面有经验。其中 2 名关键知情人是在加纳试点整合的医院中行医的药用植物医生。我们使用框架分析来确定关键知情人对整合的看法。
大多数关键知情人支持整合,尽管一些人指出政府需要在其他公立医院支持扩大规模。被引用的优势包括雇用药用植物医生、利用传统知识、研究机会,以及通过限制处方和使用假冒草药来提高服务效率。劣势是缺乏政府实施整合的政策,由于国家健康保险计划不涵盖草药,因此存在财务挑战,宣传和研究机会不佳,以及常规卫生从业者缺乏草药培训。
研究人员对整合两种医疗保健系统——生物医学和草药——持积极态度,但也存在需要解决的挑战。整合可以为草药研究提供更多机会。对常规卫生专业人员进行更多的草药培训可以增加两个单位之间更好协调的机会。此外,需要进行强有力的宣传和宣传,以教育更多的人了解整合和利用服务。