National Institute for Health Research Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, U.K.
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, U.K.
Diabetes Care. 2019 Feb;42(2):208-214. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0431. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
Progression to insulin therapy in clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes is highly variable. GAD65 autoantibodies (GADA) are associated with faster progression, but their predictive value is limited. We aimed to determine if a type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1D GRS) could predict rapid progression to insulin treatment over and above GADA testing.
We examined the relationship between T1D GRS, GADA (negative or positive), and rapid insulin requirement (within 5 years) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression in 8,608 participants with clinical type 2 diabetes (onset >35 years and treated without insulin for ≥6 months). T1D GRS was both analyzed continuously (as standardized scores) and categorized based on previously reported centiles of a population with type 1 diabetes (<5th [low], 5th-50th [medium], and >50th [high]).
In GADA-positive participants (3.3%), those with higher T1D GRS progressed to insulin more quickly: probability of insulin requirement at 5 years (95% CI): 47.9% (35.0%, 62.78%) (high T1D GRS) vs. 27.6% (20.5%, 36.5%) (medium T1D GRS) vs. 17.6% (11.2%, 27.2%) (low T1D GRS); = 0.001. In contrast, T1D GRS did not predict rapid insulin requirement in GADA-negative participants ( = 0.4). In Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age of diagnosis, BMI, and cohort, T1D GRS was independently associated with time to insulin only in the presence of GADA: hazard ratio per SD increase was 1.48 (1.15, 1.90); = 0.002.
A T1D GRS alters the clinical implications of a positive GADA test in patients with clinical type 2 diabetes and is independent of and additive to clinical features.
在临床诊断的 2 型糖尿病患者中,进展为胰岛素治疗的情况高度可变。GAD65 自身抗体(GADA)与更快的进展相关,但它们的预测价值有限。我们旨在确定 1 型糖尿病遗传风险评分(T1D GRS)是否可以预测 GADA 检测之外的快速进展至胰岛素治疗。
我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 回归分析,在 8608 名有临床 2 型糖尿病(发病>35 岁且未经胰岛素治疗至少 6 个月)的参与者中,研究了 T1D GRS、GADA(阴性或阳性)和快速胰岛素需求(5 年内)之间的关系。T1D GRS 连续分析(作为标准化分数)和基于先前报道的 1 型糖尿病人群的百分位数(<第 5 个[低]、第 5 个至第 50 个[中]和>第 50 个[高])进行分类。
在 GADA 阳性参与者(3.3%)中,T1D GRS 较高者进展为胰岛素的速度更快:5 年胰岛素需求的概率(95%CI):47.9%(35.0%,62.78%)(高 T1D GRS)vs. 27.6%(20.5%,36.5%)(中 T1D GRS)vs. 17.6%(11.2%,27.2%)(低 T1D GRS); = 0.001。相比之下,T1D GRS 并未预测 GADA 阴性参与者的快速胰岛素需求( = 0.4)。在调整诊断年龄、BMI 和队列的 Cox 回归分析中,仅在存在 GADA 的情况下,T1D GRS 与胰岛素时间独立相关:每增加一个标准差的危险比为 1.48(1.15,1.90); = 0.002。
T1D GRS 改变了临床 2 型糖尿病患者 GADA 阳性检测的临床意义,且独立于临床特征,并与之相加。