University of California San Francisco.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1630-1639. doi: 10.1002/acr.23797. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
We examined psychometric performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures in a racially/ethnically and linguistically diverse cohort with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Data were from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study, a multiracial/multiethnic cohort of individuals with physician-confirmed SLE. The majority (n = 332) attended in-person research visits that included interviews conducted in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Up to 12 PROMIS short forms were administered (depending on language availability). An additional 99 individuals completed the interview by phone only. Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations. Correlations with the Short Form 36 subscales and both self-reported and physician-assessed disease activity assessed convergent validity. All analyses were repeated within each racial/ethnic group. Differences in scores by race/ethnicity were examined in bivariate analyses and by multiple regression analyses controlling for age, sex, disease duration, and disease damage and activity.
The total sample was 30.0% white, 22.3% Hispanic, 10.9% African American, 33.7% Asian, and 3.0% other race/ethnicity. Seventy-seven percent of interviews were conducted in-person. Non-English interviews were conducted in 26.0% of the Hispanic subjects and 18.6% of the Asian subjects. Each scale demonstrated adequate reliability and validity overall and within racial/ethnic groups. Minimal floor effects were observed, but ceiling effects were noted. Missing item responses were minimal for most scales, except for items related to work. No differences were noted by mode of administration or by language of administration among Hispanics and Asians. After accounting for differences in disease status, age, and sex, few differences in mean scores between whites and other racial/ethnic groups were noted.
PROMIS measures appear reliable and valid in persons with lupus across racial/ethnic groups.
我们考察了红斑狼疮患者中,报告结果的测量信息系统(PROMIS)在种族/民族和语言多样化人群中的心理计量学性能。
数据来自加利福尼亚狼疮流行病学研究,这是一个多民族/多种族的、经医生确诊的狼疮患者队列。大多数(n=332)参加了面对面的研究访问,其中包括用英语、西班牙语、粤语或普通话进行的访谈。最多可以进行 12 个 PROMIS 短表(取决于语言可用性)。另外 99 人仅通过电话完成了访谈。使用 Cronbach's alpha 和项目总分相关性来检验内部一致性。与 SF-36 子量表的相关性和自我报告的以及医生评估的疾病活动评估来检验收敛效度。所有分析均在每个种族/族裔群体内重复进行。在单变量分析和控制年龄、性别、疾病持续时间和疾病损害及活动的多元回归分析中,检验了种族/族裔差异对评分的影响。
总样本中,30.0%为白人,22.3%为西班牙裔,10.9%为非裔美国人,33.7%为亚洲人,3.0%为其他种族/族裔。77%的访谈是面对面进行的。西班牙语访谈占西班牙裔受试者的 26.0%,占亚洲裔受试者的 18.6%。每个量表在总体和种族/族裔群体内均表现出足够的可靠性和有效性。大多数量表的地板效应较小,但天花板效应明显。除与工作相关的项目外,大多数量表的缺失项目反应都较少。在西班牙裔和亚洲裔人群中,没有观察到不同的管理模式或管理语言之间的差异。在考虑疾病状况、年龄和性别差异后,白人组与其他种族/族裔组之间的平均得分差异较小。
在不同种族/族裔的狼疮患者中,PROMIS 量表似乎具有可靠性和有效性。