Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Wolfson Centre for Age Related Diseases, Kings College London, London, UK.
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):1811-1828. doi: 10.1177/1471301218806082. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
This study aimed to develop and explore feasibility of SettleIN, a staff-led programme about healthy adjustment for people with dementia following care home placement. The main foci were intervention feasibility and the impact of the programme on resident quality of life and mood.
A manualised intervention developed through consultation with 47 experts was trialled using a mixed-method design. Thirteen new residents with dementia and 24 staff were recruited from six UK care homes. Outcomes were measured at baseline, intervention completion and four-week follow-up. Analysis of staff interviews and field notes is reported.
Most experts deemed SettleIN to be well structured, comprehensive and appropriate. However, uptake of SettleIN was low. When implemented, staff emphasised integration ease and staff benefits, but that SettleIN may not be universally suitable. High attrition, most commonly due to death and hospitalisation, and partial results from only four participants meant that there was a lack of support for the positive outcomes. Feasibility problems included a lack of staff time and dependency on families for some components.
SettleIN is acceptable to a wide range of stakeholders though does not appear to be feasible in its current form and improvements are recommended. A second pilot phase is required, which will address the reasons for the high attrition rate in this study and amend the methodology accordingly. This is an important work, as a manualised and standardised approach to healthy adjustment in care is unique and could have huge clinical significance if effective.
本研究旨在开发并探索 SettleIN 的可行性,这是一个针对养老院安置后痴呆症患者的健康调整的员工主导项目。主要焦点是干预的可行性以及该项目对居民生活质量和情绪的影响。
通过与 47 名专家协商制定了一个手册化的干预措施,采用混合方法设计进行了试用。从六家英国养老院招募了 13 名新的痴呆症居民和 24 名员工。在基线、干预完成和四周随访时测量了结果。报告了对员工访谈和现场记录的分析。
大多数专家认为 SettleIN 结构良好、全面且合适。然而,SettleIN 的采用率很低。当实施时,员工强调了易于整合和员工受益,但 SettleIN 可能并不普遍适用。高退出率,最常见的原因是死亡和住院,以及只有四名参与者的部分结果意味着缺乏对积极结果的支持。可行性问题包括缺乏员工时间和对家庭的一些依赖。
SettleIN 得到了广泛的利益相关者的认可,但目前看来并不可行,需要改进。需要进行第二阶段的试点,以解决本研究中高退出率的原因,并相应地修改方法。这是一项重要的工作,因为针对养老院护理中的健康调整的规范化和标准化方法是独特的,如果有效,可能具有巨大的临床意义。