• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入术联合或不联合西洛他唑治疗股浅动脉病变。

Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation With or Without Cilostazol in the Treatment of the Superficial Femoral Artery.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nagano Municipal Hospital, Japan (T.M., U.I.).

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan (Y.M., U.I., K.K.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug;11(8):e006564. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006564.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006564
PMID:30354784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New-generation bare-metal nitinol (BNS) and drug-eluting stents have improved long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions. Furthermore, cilostazol reduces in-stent restenosis (ISR) after first-generation BNS implantation for femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 255 patients with femoropopliteal lesions treated at 25 cardiovascular centers. Patients were randomly assigned to the BNS group (Misago stent implantation without cilostazol), BNS with cilostazol group (Misago stent implantation with cilostazol), or drug-eluting stents group (Zilver PTX stent implantation without cilostazol). Primary end point was 1-year restenosis noted using duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio, >2.0). Secondary end point was major adverse limb events (limb-related death, target lesion revascularization, major amputation, and major bleeding). During the 1-year follow-up, 12 patients (4.7%) died and 237 (92.9%) had relevant ultrasound findings. The 1-year ISR rate did not differ significantly among the BNS, BNS with cilostazol, and drug-eluting stents groups (28.4% versus 12.2% versus 21.0%; P=0.052). Although the 1-year ISR rate was significantly lower in the BNS with cilostazol group than in the BNS group, it was similar to that in the drug-eluting stents group ( P=0.16). Major adverse limb event was significantly higher in the BNS group (16.9% versus 6.5% versus 6.3%; P=0.034); however, target lesion revascularization and major bleeding were similar (9.7% versus 5.1% versus 3.6%; P=0.25, 4.8% versus 1.2% versus 2.4%; P=0.37, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Misago stent implantation with cilostazol showed a comparable 1-year ISR rate with Zilver PTX. Cilostazol reduced the 1-year ISR rate after endovascular therapy when used with new-generation BNS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ . Unique identifier: UMIN 000010071.

摘要

背景

新一代的镍钛诺(BNS)裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架改善了接受腔内治疗的股腘病变患者的长期预后。此外,西洛他唑降低了第一代 BNS 植入治疗股腘病变后的支架内再狭窄(ISR)。

方法和结果

我们研究了 255 名在 25 个心血管中心接受股腘病变治疗的患者。患者被随机分配到 BNS 组(无西洛他唑的 Misago 支架植入)、BNS 加西洛他唑组(有西洛他唑的 Misago 支架植入)或药物洗脱支架组(无西洛他唑的 Zilver PTX 支架植入)。主要终点是通过双功能超声(峰值收缩速度比>2.0)检测到的 1 年再狭窄。次要终点是主要肢体不良事件(与肢体相关的死亡、靶病变血运重建、大截肢和大出血)。在 1 年的随访期间,12 名患者(4.7%)死亡,237 名患者(92.9%)有相关的超声发现。BNS、BNS 加西洛他唑和药物洗脱支架组的 1 年 ISR 率无显著差异(28.4%比 12.2%比 21.0%;P=0.052)。虽然 BNS 加西洛他唑组的 1 年 ISR 率明显低于 BNS 组,但与药物洗脱支架组相似(P=0.16)。BNS 组的主要肢体不良事件发生率明显较高(16.9%比 6.5%比 6.3%;P=0.034);然而,靶病变血运重建和大出血的发生率相似(9.7%比 5.1%比 3.6%;P=0.25,4.8%比 1.2%比 2.4%;P=0.37)。

结论

西洛他唑联合 Misago 支架植入的 1 年 ISR 率与 Zilver PTX 相似。当与新一代 BNS 联合使用时,西洛他唑降低了腔内治疗后的 1 年 ISR 率。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ 。唯一标识符:UMIN 000010071。

相似文献

1
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation With or Without Cilostazol in the Treatment of the Superficial Femoral Artery.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入术联合或不联合西洛他唑治疗股浅动脉病变。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug;11(8):e006564. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006564.
2
A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: The BATTLE Trial.载紫杉醇聚合物涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗首发股浅动脉病变的比较:BATTLE 试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.028.
3
Drug-eluting stenting for femoropopliteal lesions, followed by cilostazol treatment, reduces stent restenosis in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.用于股腘动脉病变的药物洗脱支架置入术,随后进行西洛他唑治疗,可降低有症状外周动脉疾病患者的支架再狭窄率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):720-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.098. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
4
Impact of Cilostazol Administration on Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.西洛他唑对股腘动脉支架内再狭窄的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Oct;24(5):640-646. doi: 10.1177/1526602817719284. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
5
Vessel Calcification as a Risk Factor for In-Stent Restenosis in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions After Zilver PTX Paclitaxel-Coated Stent Placement.血管钙化是 Zilver PTX 紫杉醇涂层支架置入治疗复杂股腘动脉病变后支架内再狭窄的危险因素。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):613-620. doi: 10.1177/1526602819860124. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
Propensity Score Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting vs Bare Nitinol Stents in Femoropopliteal Lesions.倾向评分分析:比较药物洗脱镍钛合金支架与裸镍钛合金支架在股腘动脉病变中的临床结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):33-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602815622953.
7
Bare metal stent versus paclitaxel eluting stent for intermediate length femoropopliteal arterial lesions (BATTLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.裸金属支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗中等长度股腘动脉病变的比较(BATTLE试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Oct 30;15:423. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-423.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions up to 190 mm: One-Year Outcomes of the Single-Arm IMPERIAL Long Lesion Substudy of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent.紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗最长 190mm 股浅动脉病变的疗效和安全性:Eluvia 药物洗脱支架的 IMPERIAL 长病变单臂亚研究的一年结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):296-303. doi: 10.1177/1526602820901723. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for the superficial femoral artery: the DEBATE-SFA randomized trial (drug eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for the superficial femoral artery).药物涂层球囊外周介入治疗股浅动脉:DEBATE-SFA 随机试验(药物涂层球囊外周介入治疗股浅动脉)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Clinical outcomes of polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents vs stent grafts in peripheral arterial disease patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions.在股腘动脉病变的外周动脉疾病患者中,无聚合物、紫杉醇涂层支架与支架移植物的临床结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):1998-2008.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.061. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cilostazol Effects after Lower Extremity Revascularization. Historical Background and Review of the Literature.西洛他唑在下肢血管重建术后的作用。历史背景及文献综述。
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):665-671. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.665.
2
Different drugs in drug-eluting stents for peripheral artery disease: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian meta-analysis.载药支架治疗外周动脉疾病的不同药物:系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Mar;57(3):520-530. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02932-5. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
3
Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in femoropopliteal arteries.
药物洗脱支架置入治疗股浅动脉病变的疗效的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291466. eCollection 2023.
4
Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis.腔内血管重建策略在主髂动脉和股腘动脉疾病中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Mar 14;44(11):935-950. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722.
5
Principal predictors of major adverse limb events in diabetic peripheral artery disease: A narrative review.糖尿病外周动脉疾病中主要肢体不良事件的主要预测因素:一项叙述性综述。
Atheroscler Plus. 2021 Nov 3;46:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athplu.2021.10.003. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.紫杉醇涂层器械在股浅动脉中的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275888. eCollection 2022.
7
Cilostazol effectiveness in reducing drug-coated stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery: The ZERO study.西洛他唑在降低股浅动脉药物涂层支架再狭窄中的有效性:ZERO 研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 7;17(7):e0270992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270992. eCollection 2022.
8
Intensive exercise therapy for restenosis after superficial femoral artery stenting: the REASON randomized clinical trial.股浅动脉支架置入后再狭窄的强化运动治疗:REASON 随机临床试验。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Sep;37(9):1596-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02060-9. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
9
Highly Selective PPARα (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α) Agonist Pemafibrate Inhibits Stent Inflammation and Restenosis Assessed by Multimodality Molecular-Microstructural Imaging.高选择性过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体 α(PPARα)激动剂 pemafibrate 通过多模态分子-微观结构成像评估抑制支架炎症和再狭窄。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e020834. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020834. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
10
Cilostazol: a Review of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Uses.西洛他唑:基础机制与临床应用综述。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Aug;36(4):777-792. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07187-x. Epub 2021 Apr 16.