From the Department of Radiology (A.V., T.T.).
University of Cincinnati Medical Center, OH; Department of Radiology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON (R.A.).
Stroke. 2018 Sep;49(9):2102-2107. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021484.
Background and Purpose- Although perfusion abnormality is an increasingly important therapeutic target, the natural history of tissue at risk without reperfusion treatment is understudied. Our objective was to determine how time affects penumbral salvage and infarct growth in untreated acute ischemic stroke patients and whether collateral status affects this relationship. Methods- We used a prospectively collected, multicenter acute stroke registry to assess acute stroke patients who were not treated with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. We analyzed baseline computed tomography angiogram and computed tomography perfusion within 24 hours of stroke onset along with follow-up imaging and assessed time from stroke onset to baseline imaging, ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score), vessel occlusion, collaterals, ischemic core, and penumbra. Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were calculated. Correlations between time and penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated with Spearman correlation. Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were compared between subjects with good versus poor collateral status using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Clinical and imaging factors affecting penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated by linear regression. Results- Among 94 untreated stroke patients eligible for this analysis, the mean age was 65 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 13, and median (range) time from stroke onset to baseline imaging was 2.9 (0.4-23) hours. There was no correlation between time and salvaged penumbra ( r=0.06; P=0.56) or infarct growth ( r=-0.05; P=0.61). Infarct growth was higher among those with poor collaterals versus those with good collaterals (median, 52.3 versus 0.9 cm; P<0.01). Penumbral salvage was lower among those with poor collaterals compared with those with good collaterals (poor, 0 [0-0]; good, 5.9 cm [0-29.4]; P<0.01). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that collaterals, but not time, were significantly associated with infarct growth and penumbral salvage. Conclusions- In this natural history study, penumbral salvage and infarct growth were less time dependent and more a measure of collateral flow.
背景与目的——尽管灌注异常是一个日益重要的治疗靶点,但未接受再灌注治疗的危险组织的自然病程仍研究不足。我们的目的是确定在未接受急性缺血性卒中治疗的患者中,时间如何影响缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死的进展,以及侧支循环状态是否会影响这种关系。
方法——我们使用前瞻性收集的多中心急性卒中登记处,评估未接受静脉溶栓或血管内治疗的急性卒中患者。我们分析了卒中发病后 24 小时内的基线 CT 血管造影和 CT 灌注,以及随访成像,并评估了从卒中发病到基线成像的时间、ASPECTS(阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期 CT 评分)、血管闭塞、侧支循环、缺血核心和缺血半暗带。计算了缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死的进展。用 Spearman 相关分析评估时间与缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死进展之间的相关性。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较侧支循环良好与不良的患者之间的缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死的进展。通过线性回归评估影响缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死进展的临床和影像学因素。
结果——在 94 例符合本分析条件的未治疗卒中患者中,平均年龄为 65 岁,中位 NIHSS 评分为 13 分,从卒中发病到基线成像的中位(范围)时间为 2.9(0.4-23)小时。时间与缺血半暗带的挽救( r=0.06; P=0.56)或梗死进展( r=-0.05; P=0.61)之间无相关性。与侧支循环良好的患者相比,侧支循环不良的患者的梗死进展更高(中位数,52.3 与 0.9 cm; P<0.01)。与侧支循环良好的患者相比,侧支循环不良的患者的缺血半暗带的挽救更低(不良,0[0-0];良好,5.9 cm[0-29.4]; P<0.01)。多变量线性回归表明,侧支循环而不是时间与梗死进展和缺血半暗带的挽救显著相关。
结论——在本自然史研究中,缺血半暗带的挽救和梗死的进展较少依赖于时间,更多地反映了侧支循环的血流。