Suppr超能文献

虐待指标(IOA)筛查西班牙文改编版的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Adaptation of the Indicators of Abuse (IOA) Screen.

作者信息

Touza Carmen, Martínez-Arias Rosario, Prado Carmen

机构信息

Universitat de les Illes Balears (Spain).

Universidad Complutense (Spain).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;21:E43. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.38.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to replicate the analyses conducted by the creators of the Indicators of Abuse (IOA) Screen with a Spanish sample group and compare the results, to present new validity evidences, to analyze which items were more relevant in the detection of situations of risk of abuse, and to establish a cut-off point to interpret the obtained scores. The IOA was used by 46 professionals from social services teams who assessed the situation of 231 elderly individuals and their main caregivers. The obtained results advocated towards unidimensionality of the scale. It showed a high level of internal consistency (α = .94). The Confidence Interval of 99% for the alpha coefficient was between .92 and .95. The ordinal alpha coefficient reached the value of .98. The total score of the scale showed adequate temporal stability (r = .91; p ≤ .001; N = 163). Statistically significant differences (t-test) in the mean scores of most of the items were found between cases of adequate treatment and cases of risk of abuse. The scale classified correctly 93% of all cases. The best balance between sensitivity and specificity was found at the cut-off point given by score 16 (Sensitivity = 0.94, Specificity = 0.85). The results appear to confirm the validity evidence of the instrument when used with a Spanish population. However, it is necessary to conduct further research and confirm the results with wider, more representative sample groups.

摘要

本研究的目的是对虐待指标(IOA)筛查的创建者所进行的分析进行重复,样本为西班牙人群组,并比较结果;提供新的效度证据;分析哪些项目在检测虐待风险情况时更具相关性;以及确定一个用于解释所得分数的临界点。46名来自社会服务团队的专业人员使用IOA对231名老年人及其主要照顾者的情况进行了评估。所得结果支持该量表的单维度性。它显示出较高的内部一致性水平(α = 0.94)。α系数的99%置信区间在0.92至0.95之间。顺序α系数达到0.98的值。该量表的总分显示出足够的时间稳定性(r = 0.91;p≤0.001;N = 163)。在充分治疗案例和虐待风险案例之间,大多数项目的平均得分存在统计学上的显著差异(t检验)。该量表正确分类了所有案例中的93%。在分数为16的临界点处发现了敏感性和特异性之间的最佳平衡(敏感性 = 0.94,特异性 = 0.85)。结果似乎证实了该工具在西班牙人群中使用时的效度证据。然而,有必要进行进一步的研究,并用更广泛、更具代表性的样本组来确认结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验