Pickering Carolyn E Z, Ridenour Kimberly, Salaysay Zachary, Reyes-Gastelum David, Pierce Steven J
College of Nursing, Michigan State University, United States.
College of Nursing, Michigan State University, United States.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Apr;69:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Universal screening for elder abuse and neglect is a current controversy in geriatrics, fueled by the lack of evidence on valid and reliable instruments. Since each U.S. State and many other countries have their own legal definitions of what constitutes elder abuse and neglect, this further complicates instrument development and clinical assessment. The purpose of this paper is to present data on the sensitivity and specificity of the QualCare Scale, an instrument with utility in detecting clinically significant elder abuse and neglect among older adults receiving care at home.
Data used in this analysis were collected during a training program in which trainees completed assessments (N=80) of standardized case scenarios of caregiving dyads. Trainees completed the QualCare Scale during each assessment.
This training program, including the assessments of the standardized case scenarios, was completed using a custom designed virtual-reality platform. Trainees were able to interact with the environment, older adult and caregiver within the case scenario.
Thirty-six nurses and social workers from two Michigan Medicaid Waiver Sites participated in the training program. Each participant assessed between one and five scenarios, yielding the sample of 80 assessments used in this analysis.
The research team designed each standardized case scenario to reflect whether or not the QualCare Scale subscale score should indicate reportable elder abuse and neglect per the State statute. Accordingly, the research team's QualCare Scale scores for each scenario were used as the gold standard criterion of clinical significance for comparison against the participant's assessment scores.
Sensitivity and specificity for each of the six QualCare subscales was determined. Overall, the subscales had high sensitivity (≥0.811) but a wide range for specificity (0.167-1.000).
The QualCare Scale can be an effective tool in detecting clinically significant elder abuse and neglect among older adults receiving care at home. This tool is suitable and feasible for use by practitioners working in home care. The QualCare Scale score indicating clinically significant or reportable elder abuse and neglect can be raised or lowered to be consistent with State or Country statutes, or simply used to create appropriate care plans to support caregiving. Findings from the QualCare Scale can support the multidisciplinary team in planning for and evaluating preventative interventions.
背景/目的:由于缺乏关于有效且可靠工具的证据,对老年人虐待和忽视进行普遍筛查是老年医学领域当前存在的争议。由于美国每个州以及许多其他国家对于构成老年人虐待和忽视的行为都有各自的法律定义,这进一步使工具开发和临床评估变得复杂。本文的目的是呈现关于QualCare量表敏感性和特异性的数据,该量表在检测居家接受护理的老年人中具有临床意义的虐待和忽视情况方面具有实用价值。
本分析中使用的数据是在一个培训项目期间收集的,在该项目中,学员完成了对护理二元组标准化案例场景的评估(N = 80)。学员在每次评估时都完成了QualCare量表。
该培训项目,包括对标准化案例场景的评估,是使用定制设计的虚拟现实平台完成的。学员能够在案例场景中与环境、老年人及照顾者进行互动。
来自密歇根州两个医疗补助豁免站点的36名护士和社会工作者参加了该培训项目。每位参与者评估了1至5个场景,从而产生了本分析中使用的80个评估样本。
研究团队设计每个标准化案例场景,以反映根据州法规QualCare量表子量表得分是否应表明可报告的老年人虐待和忽视情况。因此,研究团队针对每个场景的QualCare量表得分被用作临床意义的金标准标准,用于与参与者的评估得分进行比较。
确定了QualCare六个子量表各自的敏感性和特异性。总体而言,这些子量表具有较高的敏感性(≥0.811),但特异性范围较广(0.167 - 1.000)。
QualCare量表可以成为检测居家接受护理的老年人中具有临床意义的虐待和忽视情况的有效工具。该工具适合且可行,可供居家护理从业者使用。表明具有临床意义或可报告的老年人虐待和忽视情况的QualCare量表得分可以提高或降低,以与州或国家法规保持一致,或者简单地用于制定适当的护理计划以支持护理工作。QualCare量表的结果可以支持多学科团队规划和评估预防性干预措施。