Polymer Science & Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Polymer Science & Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India; Chemical Science, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), New Delhi 110001, India.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Feb 1;122:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.145. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
To investigate the interaction between the bovine serum albumin (BSA) and cationic surfactants (monomeric, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB) and dimeric/gemini, 1, 6 bis (N, N-hexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide, 16-6-16) and to find out the role of micelles in the aggregation of the protein using spectroscopic (UV-visible, fluorescence, fluorescence lifetime measurements, circular dichroism (CD), etc.) and microscopic (atomic force microscope (AFM)) techniques. The different surfactant has an effect on the polarity of the microenvironment of the protein shows in all the spectroscopic technique at below and above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). The far-UV CD spectra show that BSA is more disrupted by the dimeric surfactant compared to the monomeric CTAB above the CMC. The binding of the surfactant induce changes in the microenvironment around the aromatic amino acids residues and disulfide bond of the BSA at different pHs. The binding constant values were found to be 20.278×10M and 8.443M for the BSA-CTAB complex and BSA-16-6-16 complex, respectively. Atomic force microscope indicates the aggregation is more in case of dimeric (16-6-16) surfactant compared to the monomeric (CTAB) surfactant at the higher concentration (above their CMCs). Below and above the CMC, all changes are noticeable.
为了研究牛血清白蛋白(BSA)与阳离子表面活性剂(单体、十六烷基三甲基溴化铵,CTAB)和二聚体/双子体 1,6 双(N,N-十六烷基二甲铵溴化物,16-6-16)之间的相互作用,并找出胶束在蛋白质聚集中的作用,使用光谱(紫外可见、荧光、荧光寿命测量、圆二色性(CD)等)和显微镜(原子力显微镜(AFM))技术。不同的表面活性剂对蛋白质微环境的极性有影响,在低于和高于临界胶束浓度(CMC)的所有光谱技术中都有表现。远紫外 CD 谱表明,在 CMC 以上,与单体 CTAB 相比,二聚体表面活性剂更能破坏 BSA 的结构。表面活性剂的结合诱导了 BSA 中芳香族氨基酸残基和二硫键周围微环境的变化,这在不同的 pH 值下都有体现。BSA-CTAB 配合物和 BSA-16-6-16 配合物的结合常数值分别为 20.278×10^M 和 8.443M。原子力显微镜表明,在较高浓度(高于其 CMC)下,与单体(CTAB)表面活性剂相比,二聚体(16-6-16)表面活性剂更能促进蛋白质的聚集。在 CMC 以下和以上,所有的变化都是显而易见的。