Dijkstra Nadine, van de Nieuwenhuijzen Marieke E, van Gerven Marcel A J
Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Montessorilaan 3, 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neurosci Conscious. 2016 Jan;2016(1):niw003. doi: 10.1093/nc/niw003. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
According to most theories, perceptual switching during binocular rivalry is caused by competition between the neural representations of the two input images. It remains unclear whether competition is resolved already at the early stages of visual processing and that information about the dominant percept is then fed forward to more high-level areas or whether competition is first resolved in high-level areas and then fed back to lower levels. This study aimed to dissociate between these theories by investigating the direction of information flow prior to a perceptual switch, using Granger causality on classifier output originating from occipital, temporal, parietal and frontal regions of interest. The results point toward increased top-down information flow between temporal and occipital areas before a switch in dominance. These findings do not support a low-level account of binocular rivalry but are in line with high-level and hybrid explanations.
根据大多数理论,双眼竞争期间的知觉切换是由两个输入图像的神经表征之间的竞争引起的。目前尚不清楚这种竞争是否在视觉处理的早期阶段就已得到解决,然后关于主导知觉的信息被前馈到更高层次的区域,还是竞争首先在高层次区域得到解决,然后再反馈到较低层次。本研究旨在通过使用格兰杰因果关系分析来自枕叶、颞叶、顶叶和额叶感兴趣区域的分类器输出,来探究知觉切换之前的信息流方向,从而区分这些理论。结果表明,在优势切换之前,颞叶和枕叶区域之间的自上而下信息流增加。这些发现不支持对双眼竞争的低层次解释,而是与高层次和混合解释一致。