Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Pain Med. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):2371-2376. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny196.
To assess the effect depression has on outcomes after cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs).
Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
Single institution tertiary care center.
Fifty-seven patients with cervical spondylosis and cervical radicular pain who were deemed appropriate surgical candidates but elected to undergo CESI first were included.
Twenty-one of 57 (37%) patients with depression (defined as Zung Depression Scale >33) were included. Patient-reported outcomes including Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for arm pain (AP), NRS for neck pain (NP), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline and three-month follow-up. Minimal clinically important differences were then calculated to provide dichotomous outcome measures of success.
Overall, 24 and 28 patients achieved at least 50% improvement in AP and NP, respectively. In terms of disability, 25/57 (43.9%) patients achieved >13.2-point improvement on the NDI overall. In patients with depression, 4/21 (19.0%) and 5/21 (23.8%) achieved at least 50% improvement on the NRS for AP and NP, respectively, compared with 20/36 (55.5%) and 23/36 (63.8%) in patients without depression. This difference was statistically significant for both pain measures (P < 0.002 AP, P < 0.006 NP). Statistically fewer patients, 5/21 (24%), with depression achieved ≥13.2-point improvement on the NDI compared with 20/36 (55%) nondepressed patients (P < 0.01). There was no difference in outcomes between groups on the EQ-5D.
Patients with cervical spondylosis and comorbid depression who undergo CESI are less likely to achieve successful outcomes in both pain and function compared with nondepressed patients at three months.
评估抑郁对颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射(CESI)后结局的影响。
前瞻性收集数据库的回顾性研究。
单机构三级护理中心。
57 例颈椎病和颈椎神经根痛患者,被认为是合适的手术候选者,但选择首先进行 CESI。
21 例(37%)抑郁患者(定义为 Zung 抑郁量表>33)被纳入研究。收集患者报告的结果,包括颈部残疾指数(NDI)、手臂疼痛数字评分量表(NRS-AP)、颈部疼痛 NRS(NRS-NP)和 EuroQol-5D(EQ-5D),在基线和 3 个月随访时进行评估。然后计算最小临床重要差异,提供成功的二分法结果测量。
总体而言,分别有 24 例和 28 例患者在手臂疼痛和颈部疼痛方面的改善程度至少达到 50%。就残疾而言,57 例患者中有 25 例(43.9%)在 NDI 上总体改善超过 13.2 分。在抑郁患者中,4/21(19.0%)和 5/21(23.8%)例患者在手臂疼痛 NRS 上至少改善 50%,而在无抑郁患者中,20/36(55.5%)和 23/36(63.8%)例患者在手臂疼痛 NRS 上至少改善 50%。这两种疼痛测量方法的差异均具有统计学意义(AP,P<0.002;NP,P<0.006)。抑郁患者中,5/21(24%)例患者在 NDI 上的改善程度至少达到 13.2 分,而无抑郁患者中为 20/36(55%)例患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。在 EQ-5D 方面,两组患者的结局无差异。
与无抑郁的患者相比,患有颈椎病和合并抑郁的 CESI 患者在 3 个月时疼痛和功能的改善效果更差。