Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, USA.
University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):NP5643-NP5662. doi: 10.1177/0886260518807218. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Research repeatedly concludes that lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals (i.e., sexual minorities) are at increased risk of experiencing abuse in a romantic or sexual relationship. For service providers, a vital but largely unanswered question is how common it is for victims of sexual minority intimate partner violence (SM-IPV) to also have perpetrated IPV, particularly in regard to adolescent relationships. To our knowledge, the present article is only the second in the literature to examine adolescent SM-IPV directionality, and it is the first to compare adolescent SM-IPV directionality and heterosexual IPV (H-IPV) directionality within the same sample. In 25 high schools across three northern New England states, sexual minority ( = 398) and heterosexual ( = 2,687) high school-aged adolescents aged 13 years to 19 years (where sexual orientation is defined indirectly via sexual attraction) completed a questionnaire as part of a broader evaluation study of a bystander-focused violence prevention curriculum (we utilized baseline data in this article). Chi-square tests revealed that experiencing victimization was significantly associated with engaging in perpetration for all forms of IPV assessed for both sexual minority and heterosexual youths. The sole exception was threatening IPV, for which a significant association was found among heterosexual but not sexual minority individuals. Bidirectional IPV rates did not differ substantially by sexual attraction: Verbal abuse was most likely to be bidirectional for both sexual attraction groups and all other assessed IPV forms occurring overwhelmingly in unidirectional patterns. Although replication is needed, study results suggest that adolescent IPV is not generally bidirectional. Directions for future research are discussed, including the need for sampling plans that enable further disaggregation by age and sexual orientations.
研究反复得出结论,同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(即性少数群体)在恋爱或性关系中遭受虐待的风险增加。对于服务提供者来说,一个至关重要但在很大程度上尚未得到解答的问题是,性少数群体亲密伴侣暴力(SM-IPV)的受害者同时也实施了 IPV 的情况有多常见,特别是在青少年关系中。据我们所知,本文是文献中仅有的第二篇探讨青少年 SM-IPV 方向性的文章,也是第一篇在同一样本中比较青少年 SM-IPV 方向性和异性恋 IPV(H-IPV)方向性的文章。在新英格兰北部三个州的 25 所高中,398 名性少数群体( = )和 2687 名异性恋青少年( = )年龄在 13 岁至 19 岁之间(性取向通过性吸引间接定义)完成了一份问卷,作为旁观者为重点的暴力预防课程的更广泛评估研究的一部分(本文使用了基线数据)。卡方检验显示,对于所有形式的 IPV,经历受害与实施侵害之间存在显著关联,无论是性少数群体还是异性恋青少年。唯一的例外是威胁性 IPV,对于异性恋者存在显著关联,但对于性少数群体则没有。双向 IPV 率在性吸引力方面没有显著差异:言语虐待最有可能在两个性吸引力群体中都是双向的,而所有其他评估的 IPV 形式则主要是单向的。尽管需要复制,但研究结果表明,青少年 IPV 通常不是双向的。讨论了未来研究的方向,包括需要抽样计划,以便进一步按年龄和性取向进行细分。