UCLA Division of Sports Medicine, Pacific Palisades Medical Group, Pacific Palisades, California.
Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Jan;31(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000679.
To understand catchers' preferences for mask type and perceptions regarding safety, comfort, and fit, and determine whether mask type is correlated with self-reported concussion and related symptoms after impacts from foul tips or backswings.
Cross-sectional study.
Survey of active baseball catchers.
Professional baseball catchers.
From May 1, 2015, to June 30, 2015, an online survey was administered in English and Spanish to all Major and Minor League catchers (n = 836).
Survey items addressed the type of mask routinely and previously used (conventional or hockey style); brand and material (steel or titanium); perceptions regarding safety, comfort, and fit; and experiences with concussions.
The sample consisted of 596 catchers of which 26% reported being diagnosed with a concussion. Some concussions occurred from non-baseball activities, such as car accidents or off the field incidents. For those that occurred playing baseball, 35% resulted from a foul tip. Once catchers entered professional baseball, the use of a conventional mask rose significantly: 71% of catchers reported wearing conventional-style masks, and 30% hockey-style masks at the time the survey was conducted (P < 0.05). Both conventional and hockey-style mask wearers significantly selected hockey-style masks as providing better overall safety and protection than conventional masks (P < 0.05).
This research supports foul tips as an important cause of concussion in catchers and provides important information about preferences among catchers for masks that are not perceived as the safest and strongest. Future research should supplement these data by conducting laboratory testing to determine which masks are stronger and by collecting qualitative data to explore why some players are more likely to wear a mask type that they perceive as offering less safety or protection.
了解捕手对口罩类型的偏好,以及他们对安全性、舒适性和贴合度的看法,并确定口罩类型是否与自报告的因高飞球或挥棒回击造成的脑震荡和相关症状有关。
横断面研究。
现役棒球捕手的调查。
职业棒球捕手。
2015 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日,以英语和西班牙语向所有大联盟和小联盟捕手(n=836)进行了在线调查。
调查项目涉及常规和以前使用的口罩类型(传统式或曲棍球式);品牌和材料(钢或钛);对安全性、舒适性和贴合度的看法;以及脑震荡的经历。
该样本包括 596 名捕手,其中 26%报告曾被诊断患有脑震荡。有些脑震荡发生在非棒球活动中,如车祸或场外事件。对于那些在棒球比赛中发生的脑震荡,35%是由高飞球造成的。一旦捕手进入职业棒球,传统口罩的使用率显著上升:71%的捕手报告在接受调查时戴传统式口罩,30%戴曲棍球式口罩(P<0.05)。传统式和曲棍球式口罩佩戴者都显著选择曲棍球式口罩,认为其提供的整体安全性和保护更好,优于传统口罩(P<0.05)。
本研究支持高飞球是捕手脑震荡的一个重要原因,并提供了有关捕手对被认为不安全和保护力不强的口罩偏好的重要信息。未来的研究应该通过进行实验室测试来确定哪种口罩更坚固,并收集定性数据来探索为什么一些球员更倾向于佩戴他们认为安全性或保护力较低的口罩类型,以此来补充这些数据。