Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Universities of Berne and Zurich, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jan;46(1):72-85. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13028. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
We want to evaluate the relationship of self-assessed experience and proficiency, manual dexterity and visual-spatial ability with surgical performance.
A total of 26 professionals were included in the study which consisted of four parts: (a) self-assessment by a questionnaire regarding proficiency and experience, (b) evaluation of visual-spatial ability, (c) testing of manual dexterity assessed by validated psychomotor tests and (d) evaluation of surgical performance by Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS).
Self-assessed proficiency and experience levels did not correlate with objectively evaluated surgical performances (OSATS). However, low-level visual-spatial ability tests strongly correlated with OSATS while intermediate- and high-level tests did not. No correlation was found between psychomotor ability and clinical performance.
Self-assessed proficiency is not a good predictor for surgical performance as experts tend to be overconfident. To evaluate and predict surgical performance, visual-spatial ability tests seem to be more appropriate than measuring manual dexterity which failed to correlate with the surgical outcome.
我们旨在评估自我评估的经验和熟练度、手眼协调能力和空间视觉能力与手术表现之间的关系。
共有 26 名专业人员参与了这项研究，研究分为四个部分：（a）通过问卷自我评估熟练度和经验，（b）评估空间视觉能力，（c）通过经过验证的运动能力测试评估手眼协调能力，以及（d）通过客观结构化手术技能评估（OSATS）评估手术表现。
自我评估的熟练度和经验水平与客观评估的手术表现（OSATS）没有相关性。然而，低水平的空间视觉能力测试与 OSATS 强烈相关，而中高水平的测试则没有。运动能力与临床表现之间没有相关性。
自我评估的熟练度不是手术表现的良好预测指标，因为专家往往过于自信。为了评估和预测手术表现，空间视觉能力测试似乎比测量手眼协调能力更合适，后者与手术结果没有相关性。
