Molecular characterization and expression analysis of Asian swamp eel (Monopterus albus) CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 1a, CXCR1b, CXCR2, CXCR3a, CXCR3b, and CXCR4 after bacteria and poly I:C challenge.

The CXC chemokine receptors (CXCRs) play critical roles in innate and adaptive immune systems. In this study, six Asian swamp eel (Monopterus albus) CXCRs (MaCXCR1-4) were identified and their molecular characterization and expression patterns were analyzed. The open reading frames (ORFs) of MaCXCR1a, MaCXCR1b, MaCXCR2, MaCXCR3a, MaCXCR3b, and MaCXCR4 were 1074 bp (base pairs), 1080 bp, 1125 bp, 1146 bp, 1083 bp, and 1140 bp, and encoded proteins of 357 aa (amino acids), 359 aa, 374 aa, 381 aa, 360 aa, and 379 aa, respectively. All these CXCRs have seven conserved transmembrane domains and four cysteines (with the exception of MaCXCR3b). Multiple sequence alignment revealed that the MaCXCRs possess a typical G-protein receptor family 1 signature and a DRY motif. There are also one to four potential N-glycosylation sites in the extracellular regions of the MaCXCRs, mainly distributed in the N-terminus and extracellular hydrophilic loop (ECL) 2 region. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the MaCXCRs were clustered together with homologous proteins from other fish. Taken together with the amino acid identity and similarity analysis, these results suggested that the MaCXCRs are conserved with other homologous genes, in which CXCR4 is more conserved than CXCR1-3. The MaCXCRs loci showed conserved synteny among teleost fish, and we found that human CXCR1 shares a common ancestor with fish CXCR1a. MaCXCRs were constitutively expressed in a wide range of tissues (especially in immune-related tissues) with different expression levels, suggesting that the MaCXCRs have different roles in un-stimulated tissues, and may play vital roles under normal conditions. MaCXCRs showed different fold changes in the spleen after Aeromonas veronii and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) challenge, which suggested that MaCXCR1a and MaCXCR3a have longer antiviral activities compared with their antibacterial functions, and that MaCXCR1b possesses stronger antiviral than antibacterial activity. MaCXCR4 may play vital roles during bacterial and viral infection; however, MaCXCR2 has relatively small effect in antibacterial and antiviral responses. The differential responses of these genes to bacteria and poly I:C implied the differences in the mechanisms of defense against viruses and bacteria.