Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; Faculty of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China.
Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; Faculty of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China.
Chemosphere. 2019 Feb;216:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.136. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
17α-Ethinylestradiol (EE2) and bisphenol A (BPA) are highly toxic and widely detected endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) throughout the world in surface waters. Adsorption is an effective way to remove EE2 and BPA from water. However, it is difficult to clearly explain the mechanism of adsorption theoretically only through classic adsorption models. In order to insight into the adsorption of EE2 and BPA, site energy distribution (SED) theory was introduced to investigate the adsorption of EE2 and BPA on heterogeneous surfaces. EE2 and BPA were adsorbed on un-anthracite (unmodified anthracite) and 4K anthracite (4 mol L KOH-modified anthracite) in single- and bi-component systems under various temperatures and pHs. The results suggested that EE2 and BPA molecules first occupied the high-energy adsorption sites and then spread to low-energy adsorption sites. There were more high-energy sites on 4K anthracite, resulting in a higher adsorption capability for EE2 and BPA. Besides, increasing temperature and acidic environment were conducive to the EE2 and BPA adsorption. SED analyses indicated that, in neutral solutions, π-π electron donor-acceptor (EDA) interaction might be the primary mechanism for BPA adsorption, while ligand exchange, hydrogen bonds, and π-π EDA interaction might simultaneously work in the adsorption of EE2. It was possible that EE2 molecule was near perpendicular to surface, while BPA molecule was parallel to surface, resulting in the higher adsorption capacities of EE2. However, compared with EE2, BPA had outstanding competitive advantages in bi-component system because of the stronger π-π EDA interaction between BPA and anthracite.
17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)和双酚 A(BPA)是世界范围内地表水高度有毒且广泛存在的内分泌干扰化合物(EDCs)。吸附是从水中去除 EE2 和 BPA 的有效方法。然而,仅通过经典吸附模型理论上很难清楚地解释吸附机制。为了深入了解 EE2 和 BPA 的吸附,引入了位能分布(SED)理论来研究 EE2 和 BPA 在非均质表面上的吸附。在各种温度和 pH 值下,EE2 和 BPA 在单组分和双组分体系中分别被吸附在无烟煤(未改性无烟煤)和 4K 无烟煤(4 mol·L KOH 改性无烟煤)上。结果表明,EE2 和 BPA 分子首先占据高能吸附位,然后扩散到低能吸附位。4K 无烟煤上有更多的高能位,因此对 EE2 和 BPA 的吸附能力更高。此外,升高温度和酸性环境有利于 EE2 和 BPA 的吸附。SED 分析表明,在中性溶液中,π-π 电子供体-受体(EDA)相互作用可能是 BPA 吸附的主要机制,而配体交换、氢键和 π-π EDA 相互作用可能同时在 EE2 的吸附中起作用。EE2 分子可能接近于垂直于表面,而 BPA 分子则平行于表面,导致 EE2 的吸附容量较高。然而,与 EE2 相比,BPA 在双组分体系中具有显著的竞争优势,因为 BPA 和无烟煤之间存在更强的π-π EDA 相互作用。