Faculty of Engineering, Notre Dame University, Deir El Kamar P.O. Box 72, Lebanon.
Femto-ST Institute, UMR CNRS 6174, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 90000 Besançon, France.
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 22;18(10):3572. doi: 10.3390/s18103572.
In Body Sensor Networks (BSNs), two types of events should be addressed: periodic and emergency events. Traffic rate is usually low during periodic observation, and becomes very high upon emergency. One of the main and challenging requirements of BSNs is to design Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols that guarantee immediate and reliable transmission of data in emergency situations, while maintaining high energy efficiency in non-emergency conditions. In this paper, we propose a new emergency aware hybrid DTDMA/DS-CDMA protocol that can accommodate BSN traffic variations by addressing emergency and periodic traffic requirements. It takes advantage of the high delay efficiency of DS-CDMA in traffic burst, and the high energy efficiency of DTDMA in periodic traffic. The proposed scheme is evaluated in terms of delay, packet drop percentage, and energy consumption. Different OPNET simulations are performed for various number of nodes carrying emergency data, and for various payload sizes. The protocol performance is compared to other existing hybrid protocols. Results show that the proposed scheme outperforms the others in terms of delay and packet drop percentage for different number of nodes carrying emergency data, as well as for different payload sizes. It also offers the highest energy efficiency during periodic observation, while adjusting the energy consumption during emergency by assigning spreading codes only to nodes holding emergency data.
在体域网(BSN)中,需要处理两种类型的事件:周期性事件和紧急事件。在周期性观察期间,流量通常较低,而在紧急情况下流量会非常高。BSN 的主要和挑战性要求之一是设计介质访问控制(MAC)协议,以确保在紧急情况下立即可靠地传输数据,同时在非紧急情况下保持高能效。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的紧急感知混合 DTDMA/DS-CDMA 协议,该协议可以通过满足紧急和周期性流量要求来适应 BSN 的流量变化。它利用 DS-CDMA 在流量突发时的高延迟效率,以及 DTDMA 在周期性流量中的高能效。该方案从延迟、分组丢失率和能耗三个方面进行了评估。针对不同数量携带紧急数据的节点和不同的有效负载大小,进行了不同的 OPNET 模拟。将协议性能与其他现有混合协议进行了比较。结果表明,对于携带紧急数据的不同数量的节点以及不同的有效负载大小,该方案在延迟和分组丢失率方面均优于其他方案,并且在周期性观察期间提供了最高的能效,同时通过仅向持有紧急数据的节点分配扩频码来调整紧急情况下的能耗。