Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1872-1880. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0381-4. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Follow-up colonoscopy rates among persons with positive fecal occult blood test results (FOBT + ) remain suboptimal in many jurisdictions. In Ontario, Canada, primary care providers (PCPs) are responsible for arranging follow-up colonoscopies. The objectives were to understand the reasons for a lack of follow-up colonoscopy and any action plans to address follow-up.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 FOBT+ persons and 30 PCPs in Ontario. Eligible FOBT+ persons were identified through administrative databases and included those aged 50-74, with a 6-12 month old FOBT+, no follow-up colonoscopy, and no prior colorectal cancer diagnosis or colectomy. Eligible PCPs had ≥1 rostered FOBT+ person without follow-up colonoscopy. Transcripts were analyzed inductively using Nvivo 11 (QSR International Pty Ltd., 2015).
Reasons for lack of follow-up colonoscopy were: person and/or provider believed the FOBT + was a false positive; person was afraid of colonoscopy; person had other health issues; and breakdown in communication of FOBT+ results or colonoscopy appointments. PCPs who initially recommended follow-up colonoscopy did not change the minds of the persons who dismissed the FOBT+ as a false positive and/or who were afraid of the procedure. These FOBT+ persons negotiated an alternative follow-up action plan including repeating the FOBT or not following-up.
PCPs may not adequately counsel FOBT+ persons who believe the FOBT+ is a false positive and/or fear colonoscopy. PCPs may lack fail-safe systems to communicate FOBT+ results and colonoscopy appointments. Using navigators may help address these barriers and increase follow-up rates.
在许多司法管辖区,粪便潜血试验阳性(FOBT+)者的结肠镜随访率仍然不理想。在加拿大安大略省,初级保健提供者(PCP)负责安排结肠镜随访。目的是了解缺乏结肠镜随访的原因,以及解决随访问题的任何行动计划。
在安大略省对 30 名 FOBT+者和 30 名 PCP 进行了半结构化访谈。通过管理数据库确定了符合条件的 FOBT+者,包括年龄在 50-74 岁之间、6-12 个月前进行过 FOBT+、未进行结肠镜随访、无结直肠癌诊断或结肠切除术的患者。合格的 PCP 至少有 1 名有 FOBT+且未进行结肠镜随访的在册患者。使用 Nvivo 11(QSR International Pty Ltd.,2015)对转录本进行了归纳分析。
缺乏结肠镜随访的原因包括:个人和/或提供者认为 FOBT+是假阳性;个人害怕结肠镜检查;个人有其他健康问题;以及 FOBT+结果或结肠镜检查预约的沟通中断。最初建议进行结肠镜随访的 PCP 并没有改变那些认为 FOBT+是假阳性和/或害怕该程序的人的想法。这些 FOBT+者协商了替代的随访行动计划,包括重复进行 FOBT 或不进行随访。
PCP 可能无法充分为那些认为 FOBT+是假阳性和/或害怕结肠镜检查的 FOBT+者提供咨询。PCP 可能缺乏沟通 FOBT+结果和结肠镜检查预约的故障安全系统。使用导航员可能有助于解决这些障碍并提高随访率。