• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.及时随访癌症筛查阳性结果:PROSPR 联盟的系统评价和建议。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 May;68(3):199-216. doi: 10.3322/caac.21452. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.探索医疗补助计划参与情况及结直肠癌筛查等待时间对康涅狄格州早期检测工作的影响——一项暗访调查
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):197-203.
3
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.评估 PROSPR 联盟中乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查参与、随访和结局。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):238-246. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz137.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.PROSPR联盟内乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的筛查异常率及随访情况的差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):372-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3552-7.
6
Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.用于指导早期乳腺癌女性辅助化疗决策的基因表达谱分析:基于证据的经济分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(23):1-57. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.第385号——盆腔检查的适应症
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007.
8
9
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Cervical Cancer Screening Cascade: A Framework for Monitoring Uptake and Retention Along the Screening and Treatment Pathway.宫颈癌筛查流程:一个用于监测筛查及治疗路径中接受率和留存率的框架。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 17;32(7):407. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070407.
2
The development and application of a novel precise health management model for pulmonary nodules population: a prospective cohort study.一种针对肺结节人群的新型精准健康管理模型的开发与应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):4198-4209. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-906. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
3
Risk assessment in a Chinese cohort of 96 318 females undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening.对96318名接受机会性宫颈癌筛查的中国女性队列进行风险评估。
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf197.
4
Delays in follow-up among women with abnormal results: a retrospective study based on population-based breast cancer screening programme in China.异常结果女性的随访延迟:一项基于中国人群乳腺癌筛查项目的回顾性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1752. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22879-x.
5
Housing Status and Cancer Screening in US Veterans.美国退伍军人的住房状况与癌症筛查
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1297-1305. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09098-7. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
The roles of LncRNA CARMN in cancers: biomarker potential, therapeutic targeting, and immune response.长链非编码RNA CARMN在癌症中的作用:生物标志物潜力、治疗靶点及免疫反应
Discov Oncol. 2024 Dec 18;15(1):776. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01679-6.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer in two Indiana healthcare systems.在印第安纳州的两个医疗系统中,新冠疫情对结直肠癌非侵入性筛查试验呈阳性后接受诊断性结肠镜检查的依从性的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Nov 26;49:102937. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102937. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Clinical research framework proposal for ketogenic metabolic therapy in glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤生酮代谢疗法的临床研究框架提案
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 5;22(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03775-4.
9
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
10
Patient Perceptions on the Follow-Up of Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results.患者对癌症筛查异常检测结果后续跟进的认知
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1280-1287. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09128-4. Epub 2024 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Timeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: A scoping literature review.肺癌诊断和治疗的及时性:范围文献综述。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
3
Effect of Time to Diagnostic Testing for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Abnormalities on Screening Efficacy: A Modeling Study.时间对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查异常的诊断检测对筛查效果的影响:一项建模研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):158-164. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0378. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺癌筛查适宜性标准
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S383-S390. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.044.
5
Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.改善粪便潜血试验阳性结果随访的干预措施:一项系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):565-575. doi: 10.7326/M17-1361. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Systematic Review of International Colposcopy Quality Improvement Guidelines.国际阴道镜检查质量改进指南的系统评价
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):249-257. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000344.
7
ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Colposcopy Quality Improvement Recommendations for the United States.美国阴道镜和子宫颈病理学会(ASCCP)阴道镜标准:美国阴道镜质量改进建议
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):242-248. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000342.
8
ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Risk-Based Colposcopy Practice.美国阴道镜和子宫颈病理学会(ASCCP)阴道镜检查标准:基于风险的阴道镜检查实践。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):230-234. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000334.
9
ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Role of Colposcopy, Benefits, Potential Harms, and Terminology for Colposcopic Practice.美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学会(ASCCP)阴道镜检查标准:阴道镜检查的作用、益处、潜在危害以及阴道镜检查实践术语
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):223-229. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000338.
10
Evidence-Based Consensus Recommendations for Colposcopy Practice for Cervical Cancer Prevention in the United States.美国宫颈癌预防阴道镜检查实践的循证共识建议
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):216-222. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000322.

及时随访癌症筛查阳性结果:PROSPR 联盟的系统评价和建议。

Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.

机构信息

Chair and The Presidential Associate Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Senior Research Investigator, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 May;68(3):199-216. doi: 10.3322/caac.21452. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

DOI:10.3322/caac.21452
PMID:29603147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5980732/
Abstract

Timely follow-up for positive cancer screening results remains suboptimal, and the evidence base to inform decisions on optimizing the timeliness of diagnostic testing is unclear. This systematic review evaluated published studies regarding time to follow-up after a positive screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. The quality of available evidence was very low or low across cancers, with potential attenuated or reversed associations from confounding by indication in most studies. Overall, evidence suggested that the risk for poorer cancer outcomes rises with longer wait times that vary within and across cancer types, which supports performing diagnostic testing as soon as feasible after the positive result, but evidence for specific time targets is limited. Within these limitations, we provide our opinion on cancer-specific recommendations for times to follow-up and how existing guidelines relate to the current evidence. Thresholds set should consider patient worry, potential for loss to follow-up with prolonged wait times, and available resources. Research is needed to better guide the timeliness of diagnostic follow-up, including considerations for patient preferences and existing barriers, while addressing methodological weaknesses. Research is also needed to identify effective interventions for reducing wait times for diagnostic testing, particularly in underserved or low-resource settings. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:199-216. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

摘要

及时跟进癌症筛查阳性结果仍不理想,且缺乏有关优化诊断检测及时性的决策依据。本系统评价评估了关于乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌阳性筛查后随访时间的已发表研究。在所有研究中,由于指示性混杂,大多数研究的可用证据的质量非常低或低,潜在的关联减弱或逆转。总体而言,证据表明,等待时间的延长会增加癌症不良结局的风险,而等待时间在不同癌症类型之间存在差异,这支持在阳性结果后尽快进行诊断性检测,但具体时间目标的证据有限。在这些限制下,我们就特定癌症的随访时间提供了意见,并讨论了现有指南与当前证据的关系。设定的阈值应考虑患者的担忧、随着等待时间延长而失去随访的潜在风险,以及现有资源。需要开展研究以更好地指导诊断性随访的及时性,包括考虑患者的偏好和现有障碍,同时解决方法学上的弱点。还需要开展研究,以确定减少诊断性检测等待时间的有效干预措施,特别是在服务不足或资源有限的环境中。CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:199-216。© 2018 美国癌症协会。