Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Aggress Behav. 2019 Jan;45(1):93-102. doi: 10.1002/ab.21800. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Aggression is prevalent in early- to mid-adolescence and is associated with physical health and psychosocial adjustment difficulties. This underscores the need to identify risk processes that lead to externalizing outcomes. This study examined the extent to which the effects of three dimensions of beliefs supporting aggression on physical aggression and externalizing behavior are mediated by anger dysregulation and callous-unemotional (CU) traits. Three waves of data were collected from a primarily African American (77%) sample of 265 middle school students between the ages of 11 and 15 (52% were female). We found evidence supporting mediation such that the effects of beliefs supporting instrumental aggression and beliefs that fighting is sometimes necessary at Wave 1 on student-reported physical aggression at Wave 3 were mediated by CU traits at Wave 2, and relations between beliefs supporting reactive aggression at Wave 1 and teacher-report of student frequencies of physical aggression and externalizing behavior at Wave 3 were mediated by anger dysregulation at Wave 2. Our findings demonstrated the importance of distinguishing between dimensions of beliefs supporting aggression, as differential paths emerged between specific beliefs, CU traits and anger dysregulation, and externalizing outcomes. These findings have important clinical implications, as they suggest that specific dimensions of beliefs supporting aggression could be targeted based on whether an individual is at risk for behavior patterns characterizing CU traits or anger dysregulation.
攻击行为在青少年早期到中期很普遍,与身体健康和心理社会适应困难有关。这突显了识别导致外化结果的风险过程的必要性。本研究考察了支持攻击的信念的三个维度对身体攻击和外化行为的影响,这些影响是否通过愤怒调节和无情(CU)特质来中介。从一个主要由非裔美国人(77%)组成的 265 名 11 至 15 岁的中学生样本(52%为女性)中收集了三波数据。我们发现了支持中介的证据,即第 1 波支持工具性攻击的信念和有时打架是必要的信念对第 3 波学生报告的身体攻击的影响,是由第 2 波的 CU 特质中介的,而第 1 波支持反应性攻击的信念与教师报告的学生身体攻击和外化行为的频率在第 3 波之间的关系,是由第 2 波的愤怒调节来中介的。我们的研究结果表明,区分支持攻击的信念的维度很重要,因为在特定信念、CU 特质和愤怒调节与外化结果之间,出现了不同的路径。这些发现具有重要的临床意义,因为它们表明,根据个体是否存在 CU 特质或愤怒调节特征的行为模式风险,可以针对支持攻击的信念的特定维度进行干预。