Professional Dancers Distinct Biomechanical Pattern during Multidirectional Landings.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare lower extremity (LE) biomechanics between professional dancers (PD) and nondancers (ND) during multidirectional single-leg landings.

METHODS

Fifteen PD (27 ± 7 yr, 1.69 ± 0.1 m, 57.8 ± 9.3 kg) and 15 ND (25 ± 5 yr, 1.69 ± 0.1 m, 66 ± 10.2 kg) performed single-leg jumps in three directions: 1) lateral, 2) diagonal, and 3) forward. Dominant LE biomechanical data were collected using a motion capture system. Data were processed in Visual3D. LE kinematic (hip, knee, and ankle joint angles in sagittal and frontal planes, and range of motion [ROM]) and kinetics (hip and knee internal joint moments and vertical ground reaction force) variables were analyzed at initial contact (IC), peak vertical ground reaction force (PvGRF), and peak knee flexion (PKF). Repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

At IC, statistically significant interactions were found for ankle frontal and hip sagittal angles (P < 0.05). The main effects for groups and jump directions were attained (P < 0.05). PD at IC had lower hip and knee flexion and higher ankle plantarflexion than ND. PD had significantly higher knee (PD, 41 ± 6.1; ND, 33.8 ± 8.4) and ankle (PD, 53.7 ± 3.4; ND, 38.9 ± 8.9) ROM than ND. At IC, the lateral jump had higher hip abduction moment, hip abduction, and ankle inversion and lower hip flexion and ankle plantarflexion than the forward and diagonal jumps. The lateral jump (15.5 ± 7.7) had higher hip excursion than the forward jump (12.7 ± 5.4).

CONCLUSION

The higher extended posture of PD at IC promoted an efficient use of the knee and ankle ROM to dissipate the landing forces. Regardless of the group, jump directions also solicited different biomechanical responses, particularly between lateral and forward directions. These strategies should be considered for implementation in prevention programs, as it can foster adequate LE neuromuscular control.