Reese René, Volkmann Jens
Department of Neurology Rostock University Medical Center Rostock Germany.
Department of Neurology University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017 Aug 12;4(4):486-494. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12519. eCollection 2017 Jul-Aug.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi-DBS) is among the most effective treatment options for dystonias. Because the term "dystonia" is defined by a characteristic phenomenology of involuntary muscle contractions, which may present with a large clinical and pathogenetic heterogeneity, decision making for or against GPi-DBS can be difficult in individual patients.
A search of the PubMed database for research and review articles, focused on "deep brain stimulation" and "dystonia" was used to identify clinical trials and to determine current concepts in the surgical management of dystonia. Patient selection in previous studies was recategorized by the authors using the new dystonia classification put forward by a consensus committee of experts in dystonia research. The evidence and knowledge gaps are summarized and commented by the authors taking into account expert opinion and personal clinical experience for providing practical guidance in patient selection for DBS in dystonia.
The literature review shows that pallidal deep brain stimulation is most effective in patients with isolated dystonia irrespective of the underlying etiology. In contrast, patients with combined dystonias are less likely to benefit from DBS, because the associated neurological symptoms (e.g., hypotonia or ataxia), with the exception of myoclonus, do not respond to pallidal neurostimulation.
It is important to recognize the clinical features of dystonia, because the distinction between isolated and combined dystonia syndromes may predict the treatment response to pallidal deep brain stimulation. The aim of this review is to help guide clinicians with advising patients about deep brain stimulation therapy for dystonia and refering appropriate candidates to surgical centers.
内侧苍白球脑深部电刺激术(GPi-DBS)是治疗肌张力障碍最有效的方法之一。由于“肌张力障碍”一词是由不自主肌肉收缩的特征性现象学定义的,其临床和发病机制可能存在很大异质性,因此对于个别患者而言,决定是否采用GPi-DBS治疗可能会很困难。
通过检索PubMed数据库中的研究和综述文章,重点关注“脑深部电刺激”和“肌张力障碍”,以识别临床试验并确定肌张力障碍外科治疗的当前概念。作者使用肌张力障碍研究专家共识委员会提出的新的肌张力障碍分类法,对先前研究中的患者选择进行重新分类。作者结合专家意见和个人临床经验,总结并评论了证据和知识空白,为肌张力障碍患者选择DBS治疗提供实用指导。
文献综述表明,苍白球脑深部电刺激对孤立性肌张力障碍患者最为有效,无论其潜在病因如何。相比之下,合并肌张力障碍的患者从DBS中获益的可能性较小,因为除肌阵挛外,相关的神经症状(如肌张力减退或共济失调)对苍白球神经刺激无反应。
认识肌张力障碍的临床特征很重要,因为孤立性和合并性肌张力障碍综合征之间的区别可能预示着对苍白球脑深部电刺激的治疗反应。本综述的目的是帮助指导临床医生就肌张力障碍的脑深部电刺激治疗向患者提供建议,并将合适的患者推荐至手术中心。