Department of Neurology, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, China.
Department of Neurology, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, China; Department of Neurology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e409-e416. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.165. Epub 2019 May 27.
The globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are therapeutic targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of isolated dystonia. We conducted a meta-regression analysis on long-term studies of bilateral DBS in the GPi and STN to compare the relative effects of the 2 approaches.
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases to identify studies reporting the treatment outcomes of GPi DBS and STN DBS for isolated dystonia. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale movement score between the baseline and follow-up evaluations. We performed a regression analysis using a random effects model.
A total of 42 follow-up evaluations (30 for GPi and 12 for STN) nested in 19 studies (16 of GPi and 3 of STN) were included in our analysis. The results from univariate regression analysis suggested that shorter disease duration and STN stimulation were associated with a greater standardized change in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale movement score. On combining the factors into 1 model, only the disease duration remained significant. The regression analysis results of the GPi and STN subgroups revealed more persistent improvement after STN stimulation.
A shorter disease duration correlated positively with better DBS outcomes. The STN appeared to be an optimized stimulation target for the treatment of isolated dystonia, although randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the treatment efficacy of GPi DBS and STN DBS.
苍白球内侧(GPi)和丘脑底核(STN)是深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗孤立性肌张力障碍的治疗靶点。我们对 GPi 和 STN 双侧 DBS 的长期研究进行了荟萃回归分析,以比较这两种方法的相对效果。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册数据库,以确定报告 GPi DBS 和 STN DBS 治疗孤立性肌张力障碍治疗结果的研究。主要观察指标是基线和随访评估之间 Burke-Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表运动评分的变化。我们使用随机效应模型进行回归分析。
共有 19 项研究(16 项为 GPi,3 项为 STN)中的 42 个随访评估(30 项为 GPi,12 项为 STN)纳入我们的分析。单变量回归分析的结果表明,疾病持续时间较短和 STN 刺激与 Burke-Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表运动评分的标准化变化较大相关。将这些因素结合到一个模型中,只有疾病持续时间仍然具有统计学意义。GPi 和 STN 亚组的回归分析结果表明,STN 刺激后改善更为持久。
疾病持续时间较短与 DBS 结果较好呈正相关。尽管需要进行随机对照试验来比较 GPi DBS 和 STN DBS 的治疗效果,但 STN 似乎是治疗孤立性肌张力障碍的优化刺激靶点。