Oravivattanakul Srivadee, Benchaya Lucas, Wu Guiyun, Ahmed Anwar, Itin Ilia, Cooper Scott, Gostkowski Michal, Rudolph Joseph, Appleby Kristin, Sweeney Patrick, Fernandez Hubert H
Center of Neurological Restoration Department of Neurology Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2015 Oct 28;3(1):31-35. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12261. eCollection 2016 Jan-Feb.
The aim of this work was to describe utilization patterns of dopamine transporter (DaT) scan and its influence on patient management at a single movement disorders center. DaT scan helps differentiate between neurodegenerative from non-neurodegenerative parkinsonism and essential tremor (ET). It has been recently approved in the United States in 2011.
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients, observed by movement disorders neurologists, who received a DaT scan. Demographic data, medication use, and prescan diagnosis were collected.
A total of 216 DaT scans were performed at our center from 1 June 2011 to 31 October 2012. A total of 175 scans were included for analysis. Rates of DaT scan utilization varied from 5 to 33 per 100 new patients observed. When our specialists suspected neurodegenerative parkinsonism before the scan (N = 70), the scan was abnormal in 57%. When non-neurodegenerative parkinsonism was prescan diagnosis (N = 46), the scan was normal in 65%. When essential/dystonic tremor was suspected (N = 14), the scan was normal in 79%. When psychogenic disorder was the prescan diagnosis (N = 15), the scan was normal in only 47%. Only 4% of patients with abnormal scan remained off anti-PD medications, whereas 24% of patients with negative scan were still on anti-PD medications.
DaT scan utilization among specialists varied greatly. Scan results correlated most when prescan diagnosis was ET than when working diagnosis was neurodegenerative parkinsonism or other non-neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Scan result was least consistent when prescan diagnosis was psychogenic disorder. Finally, DaT scans influenced medical treatment more when it was abnormal, compared to when it was normal.
本研究旨在描述多巴胺转运体(DaT)扫描在单一运动障碍中心的使用模式及其对患者管理的影响。DaT扫描有助于区分神经退行性帕金森综合征与非神经退行性帕金森综合征以及特发性震颤(ET)。该扫描于2011年在美国获得批准。
我们对所有接受DaT扫描的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者由运动障碍神经科医生进行观察。收集了人口统计学数据、用药情况和扫描前诊断。
2011年6月1日至2012年10月31日期间,我们中心共进行了216次DaT扫描。其中175次扫描纳入分析。DaT扫描的使用率为每100名新观察患者中有5至33次。当我们的专家在扫描前怀疑为神经退行性帕金森综合征时(N = 70),扫描结果异常的比例为57%。当扫描前诊断为非神经退行性帕金森综合征时(N = 46),扫描结果正常的比例为65%。当怀疑为特发性/肌张力障碍性震颤时(N = 14),扫描结果正常的比例为79%。当扫描前诊断为精神性疾病时(N = 15),扫描结果正常的比例仅为47%。扫描结果异常的患者中只有4%停用了抗帕金森药物,而扫描结果为阴性的患者中有24%仍在服用抗帕金森药物。
专家之间DaT扫描的使用率差异很大。与工作诊断为神经退行性帕金森综合征或其他非神经退行性帕金森综合征相比,当扫描前诊断为特发性震颤时,扫描结果的相关性最高。当扫描前诊断为精神性疾病时,扫描结果的一致性最差。最后,与扫描结果正常时相比,DaT扫描结果异常时对医疗治疗的影响更大。