• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Clinical Outcome and Stimulation Parameters.丘脑深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤的长期疗效及刺激参数
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Mar 1;3(6):567-572. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12337. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.
2
Safety and efficacy of dual-lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis tremor: a single-centre, randomised, single-blind, pilot trial.双侧丘脑深部脑刺激治疗难治性多发性硬化震颤的安全性和有效性:单中心、随机、单盲、初步试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Sep;16(9):691-700. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30166-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus or ventralis intermedius nucleus of thalamus for Holmes tremor.内侧苍白球或丘脑腹中间核的深部脑刺激治疗霍尔姆斯震颤。
Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Oct;38(4):753-63. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0636-0. Epub 2015 May 20.
4
Loss of long-term benefit from VIM-DBS in essential tremor: A secondary analysis of repeated measurements.VIM-DBS 治疗原发性震颤长期获益丧失:重复测量的二次分析。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Feb;28(2):279-288. doi: 10.1111/cns.13770. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
5
Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus versus Posterior Subthalamic Area: Network Meta-Analysis of DBS Target Site Efficacy for Essential Tremor.丘脑腹中间核与丘脑后下核:深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤靶点疗效的网络荟萃分析。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022;100(4):224-235. doi: 10.1159/000522573. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Is staged bilateral thalamic radiosurgery an option for otherwise surgically ineligible patients with medically refractory bilateral tremor?对于其他手术不适合且药物难治性双侧震颤的患者,分期双侧丘脑放射外科手术是否可行?
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):617-626. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS162044. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Confined Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Refractory Essential Tremor.难治性特发性震颤的丘脑深部脑刺激术
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(5):296-304. doi: 10.1159/000493546. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
Do patient's get angrier following STN, GPi, and thalamic deep brain stimulation.患者在接受 STN、Gpi 和丘脑底核深部脑刺激后是否会变得更愤怒?
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan;54 Suppl 1:S227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.077. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
9
Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Target Consideration.优化特发性震颤的深部脑刺激:一项用于靶点考量的随机对照试验
Neurosurgery. 2024 Jan 25;95(1):63-75. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002839.
10
Response to Thalamic Ventralis Intermedius Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor vs. Essential Tremor-Plus.原发性震颤与原发性震颤叠加综合征对丘脑腹中间核深部脑刺激的反应
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 29;12:790027. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.790027. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring White Matter Microstructure with Symptom Severity and Outcomes Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes.探讨震颤综合征深部脑刺激后症状严重程度和结局与白质微观结构的关系。
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2024 Aug 28;14:43. doi: 10.5334/tohm.904. eCollection 2024.
2
Management of essential tremor deep brain stimulation-induced side effects.特发性震颤深部脑刺激引起的副作用的管理。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 22;18:1353150. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1353150. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex modulates the outcome of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.性别调节帕金森病患者丘脑底核深部脑刺激的结果。
Neural Regen Res. 2023 Apr;18(4):901-907. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.353506.
4
Which one is the superior target? A comparison and pooled analysis between posterior subthalamic area and ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.哪个靶点更优?苍白球内侧部和丘脑底核慢性电刺激治疗特发性震颤的对比及汇总分析。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):1380-1392. doi: 10.1111/cns.13878. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
5
A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson's Disease.一种新型可植入闭环临床神经接口:在帕金森病中的首次应用
Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 7;15:763235. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.763235. eCollection 2021.
6
Loss of long-term benefit from VIM-DBS in essential tremor: A secondary analysis of repeated measurements.VIM-DBS 治疗原发性震颤长期获益丧失:重复测量的二次分析。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Feb;28(2):279-288. doi: 10.1111/cns.13770. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
7
Habituation After Deep Brain Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes.震颤综合征深部脑刺激后的习惯化:患病率、危险因素及长期预后
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 3;12:696950. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.696950. eCollection 2021.
8
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment for essential tremor shows sustained efficacy: a meta-analysis.磁共振引导聚焦超声治疗原发性震颤的疗效持续时间:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Feb;45(1):533-544. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01562-w. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes.深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤和其他震颤综合征:当前靶点及临床结果的叙述性综述
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):925. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120925.
10
Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS.比较脑深部电刺激术(Vim-DBS)的编程环节
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 3;11:987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00987. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurohistopathological findings at the electrode-tissue interface in long-term deep brain stimulation: systematic literature review, case report, and assessment of stimulation threshold safety.长期脑深部电刺激电极-组织界面的神经组织病理学发现:系统文献综述、病例报告及刺激阈值安全性评估
Neuromodulation. 2014 Jul;17(5):405-18; discussion 418. doi: 10.1111/ner.12192. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
2
The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond.丘脑深部脑刺激治疗原发性震颤的安全性和有效性:10 年及以上。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 May;85(5):567-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
3
Loss of benefit in VIM thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET): how prevalent is it?丘脑底核(VIM)深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗原发性震颤(ET)获益丧失:有多常见?
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Jul;19(7):676-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
4
Essential tremor 10, 20, 30, 40: clinical snapshots of the disease by decade of duration.特发性震颤 10、20、30、40:按发病持续时间划分的疾病临床快照。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Jun;20(6):949-54. doi: 10.1111/ene.12123. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
5
Worsening essential tremor following deep brain stimulation: disease progression versus tolerance.深部脑刺激后震颤加剧:疾病进展与耐受。
Brain. 2012 May;135(Pt 5):1455-62. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws026. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
6
Estimating annual rate of decline: prospective, longitudinal data on arm tremor severity in two groups of essential tremor cases.估计年度下降率:前瞻性、纵向研究两组特发性震颤病例手臂震颤严重程度的数据。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;82(7):761-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.229740. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression.中脑腹侧中间核深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:震颤抑制的习惯化。
J Neurol. 2011 Mar;258(3):434-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5773-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
8
How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor.最常见的成人运动障碍有多常见?特发性震颤全球患病率的最新更新。
Mov Disord. 2010 Apr 15;25(5):534-41. doi: 10.1002/mds.22838.
9
Long-term deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: 12-year clinicopathologic follow-up.长期脑深部电刺激治疗原发性震颤:12 年临床病理随访。
Mov Disord. 2010 Jan 30;25(2):232-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.22935.
10
Long-term results of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.丘脑深部电刺激治疗原发性震颤的长期疗效。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;112(6):1271-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.10.JNS09371.

丘脑深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤的长期疗效及刺激参数

Long-term Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Clinical Outcome and Stimulation Parameters.

作者信息

Rodríguez Cruz Pedro M, Vargas Antonio, Fernández-Carballal Carlos, Garbizu Jose, De La Casa-Fages Beatriz, Grandas Francisco

机构信息

Movement Disorders Deep Brain Stimulation Group Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain.

出版信息

Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Mar 1;3(6):567-572. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12337. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1002/mdc3.12337
PMID:30363558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6178759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The reasons underlying the loss of efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis intermedius (VIM-DBS) over time in patients with essential tremor are not well understood.

METHODS

Long-term clinical outcome and stimulation parameters were evaluated in 14 patients with essential tremor who underwent VIM-DBS. The mean ± standard deviation postoperative follow-up was 7.7 ± 3.8 years. At each visit (every 3-6 months), tremor was assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale (FTM-TRS) and stimulation parameters were recorded (contacts, voltage, frequency, pulse width, and total electrical energy delivered by the internal generator [TEED ]).

RESULTS

The mean reduction in FTM-TRS score was 73.4% at 6 months after VIM-DBS surgery ( < 0.001) and 50.1% at the last visit ( < 0.001). The gradual worsening of FTM-TRS scores over time fit a linear regression model (coefficient of determination [R] = 0.887; < 0.001). Stimulation adjustments to optimize tremor control required a statistically significant increase in voltage ( = 0.01), pulse width ( = 0.01), frequency ( = 0.02), and TEED ( = 0.008). TEED fit a third-order polynomial curve model throughout the follow-up period (R = 0.966; < 0.001). The initial exponential increase (first 4 years of VIM-DBS) was followed by a plateau and a further increase from the seventh year onward.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that the waning effect of VIM-DBS over time in patients with essential tremor may be the consequence of a combination of factors. Superimposed on the progression of the disease, tolerance can occur during the early years of stimulation.

摘要

背景

原发性震颤患者丘脑腹中间核深部脑刺激(VIM-DBS)疗效随时间丧失的潜在原因尚不清楚。

方法

对14例行VIM-DBS的原发性震颤患者的长期临床结局和刺激参数进行评估。术后平均随访时间为7.7±3.8年。每次随访(每3 - 6个月)时,使用法恩-托洛萨-马林震颤评分量表(FTM-TRS)评估震颤,并记录刺激参数(触点、电压、频率、脉冲宽度以及内部发生器传递的总电能[TEED])。

结果

VIM-DBS手术后6个月时,FTM-TRS评分平均降低73.4%(<0.001),末次随访时为50.1%(<0.001)。FTM-TRS评分随时间逐渐恶化符合线性回归模型(决定系数[R]=0.887;<0.001)。为优化震颤控制而进行的刺激调整需要在电压(=0.01)、脉冲宽度(=0.01)、频率(=0.02)和TEED(=0.008)方面有统计学意义的增加。在整个随访期间,TEED符合三阶多项式曲线模型(R = 0.966;<0.001)。最初呈指数增长(VIM-DBS的前4年),随后是平台期,从第7年起进一步增加。

结论

目前的研究结果表明,原发性震颤患者中VIM-DBS疗效随时间减弱可能是多种因素共同作用的结果。叠加在疾病进展之上,刺激早期可能会出现耐受性。