Suppr超能文献

比较脑深部电刺激术(Vim-DBS)的编程环节

Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS.

作者信息

Reitz Sarah C, Luger Sebastian, Lapa Sriramya, Eibach Michael, Filmann Natalie, Seifert Volker, Weise Lutz, Klein Johannes C, Kang Jun-Suk, Baudrexel Simon, Quick-Weller Johanna

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 3;11:987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00987. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Essential Tremor (ET) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremor most commonly affecting the hands and arms. Medically intractable ET can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM). We investigated whether the location of the effective contact (most tremor suppression with at least side effects) in VIM-DBS for ET changes over time, indicating a distinct mechanism of loss of efficacy that goes beyond progression of tremor severity, or a mere reduction of DBS efficacy. We performed programming sessions in 10 patients who underwent bilateral vim-DBS surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department. In addition to the intraoperative (T1) and first clinical programming session (T2) a third programming session (T3) was performed to assess the effect- and side effect threshold (minimum voltage at which a tremor suppression or side effects occurred). Additionally, we compared the choice of the effective contact between T1 and T2 which might be affected by a surgical induced "brain shift." Over a time span of about 4 years VIM-DBS in ET showed continuous efficacy in tremor suppression during stim-ON compared to stim-OFF. Compared to immediate postoperative programming sessions in ET-patients with DBS, long-term evaluation showed no relevant change in the choice of contact with respect to side effects and efficacy. In the majority of the cases the active contact at T2 did not correspond to the most effective intraoperative stimulation site T1, which might be explained by a brain-shift due to cerebral spinal fluid loss after neurosurgical procedure.

摘要

特发性震颤(ET)是一种进行性神经疾病,其特征为姿势性和动作性震颤,最常影响手部和手臂。药物治疗难以控制的ET可通过丘脑腹中间核(VIM)的深部脑刺激(DBS)进行治疗。我们研究了ET的VIM-DBS中有效触点(震颤抑制效果最佳且副作用最小)的位置是否随时间变化,这表明存在一种不同于震颤严重程度进展的疗效丧失机制,或者仅仅是DBS疗效的降低。我们对2009年至2017年在我科接受双侧VIM-DBS手术的10例患者进行了程控。除术中(T1)和首次临床程控(T2)外,还进行了第三次程控(T3)以评估疗效阈值和副作用阈值(出现震颤抑制或副作用的最小电压)。此外,我们比较了T1和T2之间有效触点的选择,这可能会受到手术引起的“脑移位”的影响。在大约4年的时间跨度内,与刺激关闭相比,ET患者的VIM-DBS在刺激开启期间对震颤抑制具有持续疗效。与DBS术后立即进行程控的ET患者相比,长期评估显示在副作用和疗效方面,触点的选择没有相关变化。在大多数情况下,T2时的有效触点与术中最有效的刺激部位T1不一致,这可能是由于神经外科手术后脑脊液流失导致脑移位所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e7/7494809/f55e92a93a50/fneur-11-00987-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验