Altmann Erika, Stirling Christine, Broad Liz
School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Digit Health. 2018 Oct 18;4:2055207618806083. doi: 10.1177/2055207618806083. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
We aimed to improve the decision quality and outcomes for families with children or adolescents with diabetes considering continuous sub-cutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
A mixed method study involved three focus groups with youth, parents and clinicians to provide experience information as background to the development of a decision aid (DA). A pre-test (T1) and post-test (T2) evaluation of the DA with a convenience sample of five families considering initiating CSII.
The focus group data showed that families found the move to CSII to be generally empowering with adolescents engaging with the technology quickly, and that experiential information from others was important in the process. Participants increased their knowledge and decreased decisional conflict after using the DA from T1 to T2. Preferred option measurement indicated that at T1, three participants were 'unsure' and two participants' preferred option was CSII. After exposure to the DA at T2, those who were previously unsure had a preferred option of CSII with a resulting five people with a preferred option of CSII.
The results from this study suggest that transitioning to CSII for paediatric and adolescent patients and their carers may be assisted by a DA and that participants felt empowered to a make decision regarding CSII when using the PANDANI DA. The quasi-experimental design without randomisation or control group was a study limitation caused by the small number of participants. Expanding this pilot research into a randomised control trial would decrease the threat to validity from other possible explanations for the improvement in decisional conflict, such as nurse educators.
我们旨在提高患有糖尿病的儿童或青少年家庭在考虑持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)时的决策质量和结果。
一项混合方法研究包括与青少年、父母和临床医生进行的三个焦点小组,以提供经验信息作为决策辅助工具(DA)开发的背景。对五名考虑开始使用CSII的家庭的便利样本进行DA的预测试(T1)和后测试(T2)评估。
焦点小组数据显示,家庭发现转向CSII总体上能增强能力,青少年能很快适应该技术,而且他人的经验信息在这一过程中很重要。从T1到T2使用DA后,参与者的知识增加,决策冲突减少。首选选项测量表明,在T1时,三名参与者“不确定”,两名参与者的首选选项是CSII。在T2接触DA后,那些之前不确定的人将CSII作为首选选项,最终有五人将CSII作为首选选项。
本研究结果表明,决策辅助工具可能有助于儿科和青少年患者及其护理人员向CSII过渡,并且参与者在使用PANDANI决策辅助工具时感到有能力就CSII做出决定。由于参与者数量少,无随机分组或对照组的准实验设计是本研究的一个局限。将这项试点研究扩展为随机对照试验将减少其他可能解释决策冲突改善的因素(如护士教育者)对有效性的威胁。