School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, 4029, Australia.
School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, 4029, Australia.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Dec;38:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
To determine the level of agreement between a telehealth and in-person assessment of a representative sample of patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions referred to an advanced-practice physiotherapy screening clinic.
Repeated-measures study design.
42 patients referred to the Neurosurgical & Orthopaedic Physiotherapy Screening Clinic (Queensland, Australia) for assessment of their chronic lumbar spine, knee or shoulder condition.
Participants underwent two consecutive assessments by different physiotherapists within a single clinic session. In-person assessments were conducted as per standard clinical practice. Telehealth assessments took place remotely via videoconferencing. Six Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists were paired together to perform both assessment types.
Clinical management decisions including (i) recommended management pathways, (ii) referral to allied health professions, (iii) clinical diagnostics, and (iv) requirement for further investigations were compared using reliability and agreement statistics.
There was substantial agreement (83.3%; 35/42 cases) between in-person and telehealth assessments for recommended management pathways. Moderate to near perfect agreement (AC1 = 0.58-0.9) was reached for referral to individual allied health professionals. Diagnostic agreement was 83.3% between the two delivery mediums, whilst there was substantial agreement (81%; AC1 = 0.74) when requesting further investigations. Overall, participants were satisfied with the telehealth assessment.
There is a high level of agreement between telehealth and in-person assessments with respect to clinical management decisions and diagnosis of patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions managed in an advanced-practice physiotherapy screening clinic. Telehealth can be considered as a viable and effective medium to assess those patients who are unable to attend these services in person.
确定远程医疗与门诊评估对慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者代表性样本的评估结果的一致性,这些患者被转诊至高级实践物理治疗筛查诊所。
重复测量研究设计。
42 名患者被转诊至神经外科和骨科物理治疗筛查诊所(澳大利亚昆士兰州),以评估其慢性腰椎、膝盖或肩部疾病。
参与者在单个诊所就诊期间由不同的物理治疗师进行两次连续评估。门诊评估按照标准临床实践进行。远程医疗评估通过视频会议远程进行。六位肌肉骨骼物理治疗师配对进行两种评估类型。
临床管理决策,包括(i)推荐的管理路径、(ii)向其他健康专业人员的转诊、(iii)临床诊断,以及(iv)对进一步检查的需求,使用可靠性和一致性统计数据进行比较。
在推荐的管理路径方面,门诊和远程医疗评估之间存在高度一致(83.3%,35/42 例)。对于向个别联合健康专业人员的转诊,达到了中度至近乎完美的一致(AC1=0.58-0.9)。两种交付媒介之间的诊断一致性为 83.3%,而在要求进行进一步检查时,存在高度一致(81%,AC1=0.74)。总体而言,参与者对远程医疗评估感到满意。
在高级实践物理治疗筛查诊所中管理的慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的临床管理决策和诊断方面,远程医疗与门诊评估之间存在高度一致。对于那些无法亲自到这些服务就诊的患者,远程医疗可以被视为一种可行且有效的评估手段。