• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适应迭代剂量降低 3D 对头部和颈部 CTA 中肩部图像质量改善的影响。

The impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D on the improvement of shoulder image quality in head and neck CTA.

机构信息

a Department of CT Diagnosis , Cangzhou Central Hospital , Cangzhou , Hebei 061001 , PR China.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):887-891. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1541446. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2018.1541446
PMID:30366505
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3 D (AIDR3D) on the improvement of shoulder image quality in low-radiographic dose head and neck CT angiography (CTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety patients who underwent CTA examination were randomly divided into two groups, namely group A (n = 45) and B (n = 45). Patients in group A were scanned under 120 kV and 300 mA, with images reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP), and patients in group B were scanned under 80 kV and auto mA with images reconstructed by AIDR3D. Image quality was accessed by two experienced radiologists. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of common carotid artery (CCA) at C7 level, and radiation dosage were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The score of CCA in group B was significantly higher than group A (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in the scores of carotid sinus and internal carotid artery between the two groups (p > 0.05). The score of intracranial artery in group B was lower than that of group A, however, the image quality in group B can meet the requirement of clinical diagnosis. The noise value of CCA at C7 level in group B was significantly lower than that of group A (p < 0.05). SNR and CNR values of CCA at C7 level in group B were significantly higher than those of group A (p < 0.05). Effective radiation dose in group B was significantly decreased compared with group A (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AIDR3D remarkably improved image quality in low-radiographic dose head and neck CTA over FBP, which made the low-dose CTA images meet the requirement of clinical diagnosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨自适应迭代剂量降低 3D(AIDR3D)在降低头颈部 CT 血管造影(CTA)低剂量辐射剂量的同时,对改善肩部图像质量的影响。

材料与方法

90 例行 CTA 检查的患者随机分为两组,A 组(n=45)和 B 组(n=45)。A 组患者采用 120kV 和 300mA 扫描,滤波反投影(FBP)重建图像;B 组患者采用 80kV 和自动 mA 扫描,AIDR3D 重建图像。由两位有经验的放射科医生评估图像质量。比较两组患者颈总动脉(CCA)于 C7 水平的噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)以及辐射剂量。

结果

B 组 CCA 评分明显高于 A 组(p<0.05),而两组颈动脉窦和颈内动脉评分无明显差异(p>0.05)。B 组颅内动脉评分低于 A 组,但 B 组图像质量能满足临床诊断要求。B 组 CCA 于 C7 水平的噪声值明显低于 A 组(p<0.05)。B 组 CCA 于 C7 水平的 SNR 和 CNR 值明显高于 A 组(p<0.05)。B 组有效辐射剂量明显低于 A 组(p<0.05)。

结论

与 FBP 相比,AIDR3D 可显著提高低剂量头颈部 CTA 的图像质量,使低剂量 CTA 图像满足临床诊断要求。

相似文献

1
The impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D on the improvement of shoulder image quality in head and neck CTA.自适应迭代剂量降低 3D 对头部和颈部 CTA 中肩部图像质量改善的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):887-891. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1541446. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.头颈部CT血管造影中自适应迭代剂量降低3D与滤波反投影的比较。
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jan;72(1):96.e1-96.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
3
Application of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V With Combination of 80 kV for Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography for Slim Patients.自适应统计迭代重建-V 联合 80kV 在降低肥胖患者肾 CT 血管成像辐射剂量和改善图像质量中的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Nov;26(11):e324-e332. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Comparative analysis of radiation dose and image quality between organ dose modulation and 3D smart mA modulation during head-neck CT angiography.头颈部 CT 血管造影中器官剂量调制与 3D 智能毫安调制的辐射剂量和图像质量的对比分析。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2019;27(1):97-110. doi: 10.3233/XST-180443.
5
[Application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction veo and 80 kv in renal computed tomography angiography].自适应统计迭代重建技术(VEO)及80千伏在肾脏计算机断层扫描血管造影中的应用
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 2;99(25):1953-1958. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.25.010.
6
Impact of iterative model reconstruction combined with dose reduction on the image quality of head and neck CTA in children.迭代模型重建联合剂量降低对儿童头颈部 CTA 图像质量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30300-4.
7
Assessment of radiation dose and iodine load reduction in head-neck CT angiography using two scan protocols with wide-detector.应用宽探测器两种扫描方案对头颈部 CT 血管造影术进行辐射剂量和碘负荷降低评估
J Xray Sci Technol. 2019;27(5):981-993. doi: 10.3233/XST-190541.
8
Subtraction CT angiography in head and neck with low radiation and contrast dose dual-energy spectral CT using rapid kV-switching technique.采用快速千伏切换技术的低辐射和低对比剂剂量双能谱CT对头颈部进行减影CT血管造影。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jun;91(1086):20170631. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170631. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Coronary Angiography with Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Strong Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional (AIDR3D).采用自动管电流调制和强适应性迭代剂量降低三维技术(AIDR3D)的CT冠状动脉造影的图像质量和辐射剂量
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142185. eCollection 2015.
10
Low-Dose Computed Tomography With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and Low Tube Voltage in Craniocervical Computed Tomographic Angiography: Impact of Body Mass Index.颅颈计算机断层血管造影中采用自适应统计迭代重建和低管电压的低剂量计算机断层扫描:体重指数的影响
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):774-80. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000260.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction vs. Iterative Reconstruction for Quality of Low-Dose Head-and-Neck CT Angiography with Different Tube-Voltage Protocols in Emergency-Department Patients.基于深度学习的重建与迭代重建在急诊科患者不同管电压协议下低剂量头颈部CT血管造影质量的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 21;12(5):1287. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051287.