Interventional Radiology Department, University College London Hospital Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Interventional Radiology Department, University College London Hospital Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Clin Radiol. 2019 Jan;74(1):79.e15-79.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
To investigate inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievals and the use of the excimer laser sheath to assist in complex cases.
Retrospective analysis was undertaken of 181 attempted filter retrievals over a 6 year period. Pre- and perioperative imaging was analysed from both standard retrieval and complex retrieval techniques.
One hundred and eighty-one IVC filter retrievals were attempted: 130 (72%) standard retrievals were successful and 51 (28%) failed due to device endothelialisation. Forty (23%) cases then had subsequent successful complex retrieval under general anaesthetic. Eighteen (45%) cases were removed with the sling technique and 22 (55%) cases using the excimer laser dissection technique. Where preoperative venography/computed tomography (CT) demonstrated embedding of the filter feet versus filter apex, this was predictive of requiring dissection techniques versus sling technique (13/18 patients; p<0.05 chi-squared test). The difference in device indwelling time was statistically significant between the successful standard retrieval group (134 days) versus patients who failed standard retrieval and required complex techniques (243 days; p=0.00018).
Standard retrieval techniques failed in 28% of cases. This correlated with devices that were indwelling for longer. When imaging demonstrated filter-feet endothelisation/perforation, this was predictive of requiring dissection techniques with the excimer laser.
研究下腔静脉(IVC)滤器取出术以及应用准分子激光鞘辅助处理复杂病例。
对 6 年内进行的 181 例滤器取出术进行回顾性分析。分析了标准取栓术和复杂取栓术的术前和围手术期影像学资料。
共尝试了 181 例 IVC 滤器取出术:130 例(72%)标准取栓术成功,51 例(28%)因滤器内皮化而失败。40 例(23%)随后在全身麻醉下进行了复杂的再次取栓术。18 例(45%)采用吊带技术取出,22 例(55%)采用准分子激光解剖技术取出。术前静脉造影/计算机断层扫描(CT)显示滤器足嵌入与滤器尖部,这与需要解剖技术与吊带技术的病例有关(13/18 例患者;p<0.05 卡方检验)。标准取栓术成功组(134 天)与标准取栓术失败且需要复杂技术组(243 天)的器械留置时间差异有统计学意义(p=0.00018)。
标准取栓技术失败率为 28%。这与留置时间较长的器械有关。当影像学显示滤器足内皮化/穿孔时,这提示需要应用准分子激光解剖技术。