Testing of Direct Neurorrhaphy Strain.

PURPOSE

To investigate the ideal suture material to test strain at nerve repair sites. Based on nerve strain tolerance, we aimed to determine which suture reliably failed by an average of 5% and a maximum of 8% strain when loaded to failure.

METHODS

The median nerve of 19 cadavers was exposed in the distal forearm, transected proximally, and attached to a spring gauge. It was marked 5 cm on either side of its midpoint to measure strain. A laceration was created at its midpoint. We performed a tension-free end-to-end repair with a single epineural suture. Load to failure of the repair site was recorded. We recorded strain at failure and mode of failure (pullout vs breakage). Eight different sutures were tested: 6-0, 8-0, 9-0, and 10-0 nylon; and 6-0, 7-0, 8-0, and 10-0 polypropylene.

RESULTS

Average strain at failure of 9-0 nylon most closely approximated 5% (4.9%). Moreover, 8-0 polypropylene and 10-0 nylon and polypropylene failed with average strains less than 5% and a maximum strain of failure less than 8%. Regardless of type, 6-0 to 8-0 caliber suture failed primarily by pullout of the suture from the epineurium whereas 9-0 and 10-0 nylon and polypropylene failed by suture breakage. Decreased precision through increased variability was seen when testing sutures failing via pullout.

CONCLUSIONS

Nylon suture size 8-0 has been advocated as the suggested intraoperative aid to test strain at nerve repair sites. Our study suggests that 9-0 nylon may be a more appropriate testing suture because of its more predictable failure via breakage and its failure by a threshold of 5% to 8% strain. Although 8-0 nylon and polypropylene may also represent reasonable testing sutures, 8-0 nylon failed on average above 5% strain, with strains exceeding 8%, and both failed via the mechanism of pullout.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study's findings provide information for surgeons attempting to decide during surgery whether to perform direct nerve repair.