School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Molecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
J Comput Chem. 2018 Sep 30;39(25):2067-2078. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25390. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
Computational vibrational spectroscopy serves as an important tool in the interpretation of experimental infrared (IR) spectra. In this article, we present a systematic benchmarking study of DFTB3 with two different computational vibrational spectroscopic methods, based on either normal mode analysis (NMA) or fast Fourier transform dipole autocorrelation function (FT-DAC). The results were compared with experimental data and theoretical calculations with B3LYP/cc-pVTZ. The empirical scaling factors for DFTB3/NMA, DFTB3-freq/NMA, and DFTB3/FT-DAC methods are 0.9993, 1.0059, and 0.9982, respectively. We also demonstrate the significance of anharmonicity and conformational sampling in vibrational spectroscopic calculations on flexible molecules. As expected, DFTB3/FT-DAC predicted the anharmonic vibrational peaks more accurately than DFTB3/NMA and NMA spectra are highly dependent on the initial structures. The potential limitations of DFTB3 for vibrational spectroscopic calculations and the challenges in assigning the FT-DAC spectral peaks were noted. DFTB3/FT-DAC is expected to serve as a promising technique in computational spectroscopy in complex biomolecular systems. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
计算振动光谱学是解释实验红外(IR)光谱的重要工具。在本文中,我们基于正常模式分析(NMA)或快速傅里叶变换偶极自相关函数(FT-DAC),对 DFTB3 与两种不同的计算振动光谱学方法进行了系统的基准测试研究。将结果与实验数据和 B3LYP/cc-pVTZ 的理论计算进行了比较。DFTB3/NMA、DFTB3-freq/NMA 和 DFTB3/FT-DAC 方法的经验缩放因子分别为 0.9993、1.0059 和 0.9982。我们还展示了在柔性分子的振动光谱计算中考虑非谐性和构象采样的重要性。正如预期的那样,DFTB3/FT-DAC 比 DFTB3/NMA 更准确地预测了非谐振动峰,而 NMA 光谱高度依赖于初始结构。注意到 DFTB3 在振动光谱计算中的潜在局限性以及在分配 FT-DAC 光谱峰方面的挑战。DFTB3/FT-DAC 有望成为复杂生物分子系统计算光谱学中的一种有前途的技术。© 2018 威利父子公司