Green Jarrod L
The Australian National University, Australia.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Apr;28(3):305-319. doi: 10.1177/0963662518808729. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Sound in space. Featherless dinosaurs. Physics-defying stunts. Unrealistic science in narrative fiction is often a subject of commentary and critique. However, there is limited research investigating the significance, risks and benefits of this discourse for audiences. This article analyses interviews and focus group discussions to develop a typology of functions that are served by audience discourse about the perceived realism of science in fiction. This typology illustrates how discourse about the realism of science in fiction can serve diverse functions for diverse audiences. Practitioners who use fictional examples in science communication may benefit from an awareness of the multifaceted nature of the discourse in which they are participating.
太空中的声音。没有羽毛的恐龙。违背物理的特技。叙事小说中不现实的科学常常是评论和批评的对象。然而,对于这种话语对受众的意义、风险和益处进行调查的研究却很有限。本文分析了访谈和焦点小组讨论,以建立一种类型学,来描述受众关于小说中科学的感知现实主义的话语所发挥的功能。这种类型学说明了关于小说中科学现实主义的话语如何能为不同的受众发挥不同的功能。在科学传播中使用虚构例子的从业者可能会从意识到他们所参与的话语的多面性中受益。