Van Gorp Baldwin, Rommes Els, Emons Pascale
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Aug;23(6):646-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468566.
The aim of this paper is to gain insight into the prototypical scientists as they appear in fiction and non-fiction media consumed by children and teenagers in The Netherlands. A qualitative-interpretive content analysis is used to identify seven prototypes and the associated characteristics in a systematic way. The results show that the element of risk is given more attention in fiction than in non-fiction. Also, eccentric scientists appear more often in fiction. In non-fiction, the dimension useful/useless is more important. Furthermore, fictional scientists are loners, although in practice scientists more often work in a team. In both fiction and non-fiction, the final product of the scientific process gets more attention than the process itself. The prototype of the doubter is introduced as an alternative to the dominant representations because it represents scientists and engineers in a more nuanced way.
本文旨在深入了解荷兰儿童和青少年所消费的虚构和非虚构媒体中出现的典型科学家形象。采用定性解释性内容分析法,系统地识别出七种原型及其相关特征。结果表明,与非虚构作品相比,虚构作品中对风险元素的关注更多。此外,古怪的科学家在虚构作品中出现得更为频繁。在非虚构作品中,有用/无用这一维度更为重要。此外,虚构作品中的科学家是独来独往的,而实际上科学家更多是团队合作。在虚构和非虚构作品中,科学过程的最终产物比过程本身得到了更多关注。怀疑者原型作为主导形象的替代被引入,因为它以更细致入微的方式呈现科学家和工程师。