Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Nov;28(9):1781-1788. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001359.
We prospectively evaluated patients with completely resected uterine serous carcinoma (USC) treated with radiation "sandwiched" between carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T). The primary objective was to determine the safety profile, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate progression-free and overall survival.
Surgically staged patients with completely resected USC were enrolled to receive 3 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6-7.5) every 21 days, followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles of T/C at area under the curve of 5-6 (6 cycles + radiotherapy). Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 4.03. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare survival probabilities.
One hundred forty patients were enrolled, of which 132 were evaluable, completed at least 3 cycles of chemotherapy and radiation. One hundred seven (81%) completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy and radiation. Patients with early-stage (I/II) disease have survival probabilities of 0.96 and 0.81 at 2 and 5 years. Patients with stage I USC and lymphovascular invasion have considerably worse overall survival, with 2.7 times' higher risk of death than those without lymphovascular invasion. Patients with late-stage (III/IV) disease had overall survival probabilities of 0.64 and 0.18 at 2 and 5 years, which is far higher survival than what has been reported in single-modality trials. Interestingly, and different than what is reported in other studies, there is no difference in survival in African Americans versus whites/other races who were evaluable. Of the 779 cycles administered, 22% and 14% of cycles were associated with grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 6.9% of cycles.
The long-term follow-up in this study demonstrates that "sandwich" therapy is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment approach with acceptable toxicities. Lymphovascular invasion (LVSI) is a significantly poor prognostic factor in stage I USC. Multimodal "sandwich" therapy should be considered in all USC patients who have undergone complete surgical resection and staging.
我们前瞻性评估了接受卡铂/紫杉醇(C/T)治疗“夹心”放疗的完全切除的子宫浆液性癌(USC)患者。主要目的是确定安全性概况,次要结果是评估无进展生存期和总生存期。
对完全切除的 USC 进行手术分期的患者入组接受 3 个周期的紫杉醇 175mg/m 和卡铂(曲线下面积,6-7.5),每 21 天一次,随后进行放疗和另外 3 个周期的 T/C 曲线下面积 5-6(6 个周期+放疗)。毒性根据国家癌症研究所通用毒性标准,版本 4.03 进行分级。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩检验比较生存概率。
共入组 140 例患者,其中 132 例可评估,至少完成 3 个周期的化疗和放疗。107 例(81%)完成 6 个周期的化疗和放疗。早期(I/II)疾病患者的 2 年和 5 年生存率分别为 0.96 和 0.81。有淋巴血管侵犯的 I 期 USC 患者的总体生存率明显较差,死亡风险比无淋巴血管侵犯的患者高 2.7 倍。晚期(III/IV)疾病患者的总生存率分别为 2 年和 5 年的 0.64 和 0.18,远高于单模态试验报告的生存率。有趣的是,与其他研究报告不同的是,在可评估的非裔美国人和白人/其他种族患者之间,生存没有差异。在给予的 779 个周期中,分别有 22%和 14%的周期与 3 级和 4 级血液学毒性相关,6.9%的周期出现 3 级和 4 级非血液学毒性。
本研究的长期随访表明,“夹心”治疗是一种有效、耐受性好、毒性可接受的治疗方法。淋巴血管侵犯(LVSI)是 I 期 USC 的一个显著不良预后因素。所有接受完全手术切除和分期的 USC 患者均应考虑采用多模式“夹心”治疗。