Suppr超能文献

高危型子宫内膜癌患者辅助放化疗对比单纯放疗(PORTEC-3):一项国际性、开放标签、多中心、随机、III 期临床试验的最终结果。

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):295-309. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although women with endometrial cancer generally have a favourable prognosis, those with high-risk disease features are at increased risk of recurrence. The PORTEC-3 trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS

PORTEC-3 was an open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 trial involving 103 centres in six clinical trials collaborating in the Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup. Eligible women had high-risk endometrial cancer with FIGO 2009 stage I, endometrioid-type grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion or lymph-vascular space invasion (or both), endometrioid-type stage II or III, or stage I to III with serous or clear cell histology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m given during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m) using a biased-coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis for final analysis by intention to treat and adjusted for stratification factors. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual; follow-up is ongoing. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.

RESULTS

686 women were enrolled between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013. 660 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 330 were assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 330 were assigned to radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 60·2 months (IQR 48·1-73·1). 5-year overall survival was 81·8% (95% CI 77·5-86·2) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·7% (72·1-81·6) with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·54-1·06; p=0·11); 5-year failure-free survival was 75·5% (95% CI 70·3-79·9) versus 68·6% (63·1-73·4; HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53-0·95; p=0·022). Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occurred in 198 (60%) of 330 who received chemoradiotherapy versus 41 (12%) of 330 patients who received radiotherapy (p<0·0001). Neuropathy (grade 2 or worse) persisted significantly more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy (20 [8%] women vs one [1%] at 3 years; p<0·0001). Most deaths were due to endometrial cancer; in four patients (two in each group), the cause of death was uncertain. One death in the radiotherapy group was due to either disease progression or late treatment complications; three deaths (two in the chemoradiotherapy group and one in the radiotherapy group) were due to either intercurrent disease or late treatment-related toxicity.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer did not improve 5-year overall survival, although it did increase failure-free survival. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer should be individually counselled about this combined treatment. Continued follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term survival.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant and Cancer Australia, L'Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

摘要

背景

尽管患有子宫内膜癌的女性一般预后良好,但具有高危疾病特征的患者复发风险增加。PORTEC-3 试验旨在研究高危子宫内膜癌患者接受放疗(放化疗)期间和之后辅助化疗与单纯盆腔放疗相比的获益。

方法

PORTEC-3 是一项开放标签、国际、随机、3 期试验,涉及 6 个临床试验合作的妇科癌症协作组中的 103 个中心。符合条件的女性患有高危子宫内膜癌,FIGO 2009 分期 I 期,子宫内膜样型 3 级伴深部肌层浸润或脉管间隙浸润(或两者均有),子宫内膜样型 2 期或 3 期,或 1 期至 3 期伴浆液性或透明细胞组织学。女性被随机分配(1:1)接受单纯放疗(5 天/周,1.8 Gy 分次给予 48.6 Gy)或放疗和化疗(在放疗期间给予两个周期顺铂 50 mg/m2,随后给予卡铂 AUC5 和紫杉醇 175 mg/m2 四个周期),采用偏倚硬币最小化程序进行分层,分层因素包括参与中心、淋巴结切除术、癌症分期和组织学类型。主要终点是总生存和无失败生存。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 法、对数秩检验和 Cox 回归分析进行意向治疗的最终分析,并根据分层因素进行调整。该研究于 2013 年 12 月 20 日完成全部入组后关闭,随访仍在进行中。PORTEC-3 在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 ISRCTN8311643,在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00411138。

结果

2006 年 11 月 23 日至 2013 年 12 月 20 日期间共纳入 686 名女性。2013 年 12 月 20 日共纳入 660 名符合条件的患者进行最终分析,其中 330 名患者接受放化疗,330 名患者接受放疗。中位随访时间为 60.2 个月(IQR 48.1-73.1)。放化疗组 5 年总生存率为 81.8%(95%CI 77.5-86.2),放疗组为 76.7%(95%CI 72.1-81.6)(调整后的危险比 [HR] 0.76,95%CI 0.54-1.06;p=0.11);5 年无失败生存率为 75.5%(95%CI 70.3-79.9)与 68.6%(95%CI 63.1-73.4;HR 0.71,95%CI 0.53-0.95;p=0.022)。330 名接受放化疗的患者中有 198 名(60%)发生 3 级或更高级别的治疗期间不良事件,而 330 名接受放疗的患者中只有 41 名(12%)(p<0.0001)。放化疗后神经病变(2 级或更高级别)比放疗后更常见(3 年时 20 名[8%]女性与 1 名[1%]女性;p<0.0001)。大多数死亡是由子宫内膜癌引起的;在 4 名患者(每组 2 名)中,死因不确定。放疗组的 1 例死亡归因于疾病进展或晚期治疗并发症;化疗组的 3 例死亡(2 例)和放疗组的 1 例死亡(1 例)归因于并发疾病或晚期治疗相关毒性。

解释

高危子宫内膜癌患者接受放疗期间和之后的辅助化疗并未改善 5 年总生存率,但确实增加了无失败生存率。高危子宫内膜癌女性应单独接受这种联合治疗的咨询。需要继续随访以评估长期生存情况。

资助

荷兰癌症协会、英国癌症研究协会、澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究理事会项目拨款和癌症协会、意大利药品管理局和加拿大癌症协会研究所以及美国国家癌症研究所。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d4/5840256/811f9a0f1cc6/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验