危重症患者群体中增强型肾脏清除率的流行情况及危险因素。
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Augmented Renal Clearance in a Population of Critically Ill Patients.
机构信息
Department of Intensive Care, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Statistics, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
出版信息
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):1044-1052. doi: 10.1177/0885066618809688. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
BACKGROUND
Critically ill patients show a high, albeit variable, prevalence of augmented renal clearance (ARC). This condition has relevant consequences on the elimination of hydrophilic drugs. Knowledge of risk factors for ARC helps in the early identification of ARC. The aims of this study were evaluation of (1) risk factors for ARC and (2) the prevalence of ARC in critically ill patients over a period of 1 year.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was performed for all consecutive patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). Augmented renal clearance was defined by a creatinine clearance ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m. "Patient with ARC" was defined as a patient with a median of creatinine clearance ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m over the period of admission. Four variables were tested, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), male gender, age, and trauma as cause for ICU admission. An analysis (patient based and clearance based) was performed with logistic regression.
RESULTS
Of 475 patients, 446 were included in this study, contributing to 454 ICU admissions and 5586 8-hour creatinine clearance (8h-CL). Overall, the prevalence of patients with ARC was 24.9% (n = 113). In a subset of patients with normal serum creatinine levels, the prevalence was 43.0% (n = 104). Of the set of all 8h-CL measurements, 25.4% (1418) showed ARC. In the patient-based analysis, the adjusted odds ratio was: 2.0 (confidence interval [CI]:1.1-3.7; < .05), 0.93 (CI: 0.91-0.94; < .01), 2.7 (CI: 1.4-5.3; < .01), and 0.98 (CI: 0.96 -1.01; = .15), respectively, for trauma, age, male sex, and SAPS II. In the clearance-based analysis, the adjusted odds ratio were 1.7 (CI: 1.4-1.9; < .01), 0.94 (CI: 0.932-0.942; < .01), and 2.9 (CI: 2.4-3.4; < .01), respectively, for trauma, age, and male sex.
CONCLUSIONS
Trauma, young age, and male sex were independent risk factors for ARC. This condition occurs in a considerable proportion of critical care patients, which was particularly prevalent in patients without evidence of renal dysfunction.
背景
危重症患者存在高但可变的增强肾清除率(ARC)。这种情况对亲水性药物的消除有相关影响。了解 ARC 的危险因素有助于早期识别 ARC。本研究的目的是评估:(1)ARC 的危险因素;(2)在 1 年内危重症患者 ARC 的发生率。
方法
对我院重症监护病房(ICU)所有连续入院患者进行回顾性队列研究。ARC 定义为肌酐清除率≥130mL/min/1.73m。“ARC 患者”定义为在住院期间肌酐清除率中位数≥130mL/min/1.73m 的患者。对简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS II)、男性、年龄和创伤作为 ICU 入住原因这四个变量进行检验。采用逻辑回归进行分析(基于患者和基于清除率)。
结果
在 475 例患者中,446 例纳入本研究,共 454 例 ICU 入住,5586 次 8 小时肌酐清除率(8h-CL)。总体而言,ARC 患者的患病率为 24.9%(n=113)。在血清肌酐水平正常的患者亚组中,患病率为 43.0%(n=104)。在所有 8h-CL 测量中,25.4%(1418)出现 ARC。在基于患者的分析中,调整后的优势比为:创伤 2.0(95%置信区间:1.1-3.7;<.05),年龄 0.93(95%置信区间:0.91-0.94;<.01),男性 2.7(95%置信区间:1.4-5.3;<.01),SAPS II 0.98(95%置信区间:0.96-1.01;=.15)。在基于清除率的分析中,调整后的优势比分别为创伤 1.7(95%置信区间:1.4-1.9;<.01),年龄 0.94(95%置信区间:0.932-0.942;<.01)和男性 2.9(95%置信区间:2.4-3.4;<.01)。
结论
创伤、年轻和男性是 ARC 的独立危险因素。这种情况在相当一部分重症监护患者中发生,在无肾功能障碍证据的患者中更为普遍。