Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal School of Public Health, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C3J7, Canada.
Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Malar J. 2018 Oct 29;17(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2553-5.
Haiti and the Dominican Republic, the only two Caribbean countries with endemic malaria transmission, are committed to eliminating malaria. With a Plasmodium falciparum prevalence under 1% and a highly focal transmission, the efforts towards elimination in Haiti will include several community-based interventions that must be tailored to the local sociocultural context to increase their uptake. However, little is known about local community perceptions regarding malaria and the planned elimination interventions. The aim of this study is to develop a robust understanding of how to tailor, implement and promote malaria elimination strategies in Haiti.
A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted December 2015-August 2016 in Grande-Anse and the North Department in Haiti. Data collection included key informant interviews (n = 51), in-depth interviews (n = 15) and focus group discussions (n = 14) with health workers, traditional healers, teachers, priests or pastors, informal community leaders, public officials, and community members. Following a grounded theory approach, transcripts were coded and analysed using content analysis. Coded text was sorted by the types of interventions under consideration by the malaria elimination programme.
The level of knowledge about malaria was low. Many participants noted community beliefs about malaria being caused by magical phenomena in addition to vector-borne transmission. Participants described malaria as a problem rooted in the environment, with vector control the most noted method of prevention. Though participants noted malaria a severe disease, it ranked lower than other health problems perceived as more acute. Access barriers to healthcare were described including a lack of bed nets. Some distrust about pills, tests, and foreigners in general was expressed, and in few cases linked to previous experience with malaria campaigns under dictatorial regimes.
There are several potential barriers and opportunities to implement community-based malaria elimination interventions in rural Haiti. Elimination efforts should include the collaboration of voodoo priests and other traditional healers, be coupled with solutions to wider community concerns or other health interventions, and learn from previous or similar programmes, such as the campaign to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. It is essential to engage with communities and gain their trust to successfully implement targeted aggressive elimination activities.
海地和多米尼加共和国是加勒比地区仅有的两个存在地方性疟疾传播的国家,两国均致力于消除疟疾。海地的疟原虫流行率低于 1%,且传播高度集中,因此消除疟疾的工作将包括几项基于社区的干预措施,这些措施必须针对当地的社会文化背景进行调整,以提高其接受度。然而,人们对当地社区对疟疾的看法以及计划中的消除干预措施知之甚少。本研究旨在深入了解如何调整、实施和推广海地的疟疾消除策略。
2015 年 12 月至 2016 年 8 月在海地的大湾省和北部省进行了一项横断面定性研究。数据收集包括与卫生工作者、传统治疗师、教师、牧师或传教士、非正规社区领袖、公职人员和社区成员进行的 51 次关键知情人访谈、15 次深入访谈和 14 次焦点小组讨论。采用扎根理论方法,对转录本进行编码,并使用内容分析法进行分析。编码文本按消除疟疾规划下考虑的干预措施类型进行分类。
参与者对疟疾的了解程度较低。许多参与者指出,除了媒介传播外,社区还认为疟疾是由魔法现象引起的。参与者将疟疾描述为一种根植于环境的问题,控制病媒是最被认可的预防方法。尽管参与者认为疟疾是一种严重的疾病,但它的排名低于其他被认为更严重的急性健康问题。参与者描述了获得医疗保健的障碍,包括缺乏蚊帐。一些人对药片、测试和一般外国人表示不信任,在少数情况下,这种不信任与以前在独裁政权下开展的疟疾运动的经历有关。
在海地农村实施基于社区的疟疾消除干预措施存在一些潜在的障碍和机遇。消除努力应包括与伏都教牧师和其他传统治疗师合作,同时解决更广泛的社区关切或其他卫生干预措施,并从以前或类似的方案中吸取经验,如消除淋巴丝虫病运动。与社区接触并获得他们的信任对于成功实施有针对性的积极消除活动至关重要。