Hooker Jared B, Hawkins Beau M, Abu-Fadel Mazen S
Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 Aug 1;45(4):264-269. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-17-6263. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Superior vena cava syndrome has typically been associated with malignant conditions; however, the number of benign cases has started to grow as the use of upper-extremity venous lines and implantable cardiac devices increases. Whereas endovascular techniques are standardly used to treat patients with malignancies, the optimal care of patients with benign causes is less clear because they typically have longer life expectancies. We describe 2 cases of benign superior vena cava syndrome successfully managed with endovascular stenting, and we review the relevant literature. Of 145 cases in 10 series (average follow-up time, 24 mo), 96% of patients experienced symptomatic relief after endovascular management, with a primary patency rate of 66% and a secondary rate of 93%. Although few data exist to compare open surgical and endovascular techniques directly, both approaches appear to produce similar rates of patency. Both approaches frequently necessitate secondary intervention to maintain patency, but endovascular management is associated with fewer complications. We conclude that endovascular management of benign superior vena cava syndrome is a safe, effective, and reasonable initial management approach.
上腔静脉综合征通常与恶性疾病相关;然而,随着上肢静脉置管和植入式心脏装置使用的增加,良性病例的数量开始增多。虽然血管内技术是治疗恶性肿瘤患者的标准方法,但对于良性病因患者的最佳治疗方案尚不清楚,因为他们通常预期寿命更长。我们描述了2例通过血管内支架置入成功治疗的良性上腔静脉综合征病例,并回顾了相关文献。在10个系列的145例病例中(平均随访时间为24个月),96%的患者在血管内治疗后症状缓解,一期通畅率为66%,二期通畅率为93%。虽然几乎没有数据可直接比较开放手术和血管内技术,但两种方法的通畅率似乎相似。两种方法都常常需要二次干预以维持通畅,但血管内治疗的并发症较少。我们得出结论,血管内治疗良性上腔静脉综合征是一种安全、有效且合理的初始治疗方法。