Marchetti Nathaniel, Kaufman Theresa, Chandra Divay, Herth Felix J, Shah Pallav L, Slebos Dirk-Jan, Dass Chandra, Bicknell Stephen, Blaas Stefan H, Pfeifer Michael, Stanzell Franz, Witt Christian, Deslee Gaetan, Gesierich Wolfgang, Hetzel Martin, Kessler Romain, Leroy Sylvie, Hetzel Juergen, Sciurba Frank C, Criner Gerard J
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Apr 1;5(2):87-96. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.2.2017.0134.
: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction utilizing shape-memory nitinol endobronchial coils (EBC) may be safer and more effective in severely hyperinflated homogeneous emphysema compared to medical therapy or lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). : The effect of bilateral EBC in patients with homogeneous emphysema on spirometry, lung volumes and survival was compared to patients with homogeneous emphysema randomized in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) to LVRS or medical therapy. NETT participants were selected to match EBC participants in age, baseline spirometry, and gender. Outcomes were compared from baseline, at 6 and 12 months. : There were no significant baseline differences in gender in the EBC, NETT-LVRS or medical treatment patients. At baseline no differences existed between EBC and NETT-LVRS patients in forced expiratory volume in 1 second ( FEV) or total lung capacity (TLC) %-predicted; residual volume (RV) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) %-predicted were higher in the EBC group compared to NETT-LVRS ( < 0.001). Compared to the medical treatment group, EBC produced greater improvements in FEV and RV but not TLC at 6 months. FEV and RV in the EBC group remained significantly improved at 12-months compared to the medical treatment group. While all 3 therapies improved quality of life, survival at 12 months with EBC or medical therapy was greater than NETT-LVRS. : EBC may be a potential therapeutic option in patients with severe homogeneous emphysema and hyperinflation who are already receiving optimal medical treatment.
与药物治疗或肺减容手术(LVRS)相比,利用形状记忆镍钛诺支气管内线圈(EBC)进行支气管镜肺减容术在严重过度充气的均匀性肺气肿患者中可能更安全、更有效。
将双侧EBC治疗均匀性肺气肿患者对肺功能测定、肺容积和生存率的影响,与在国家肺气肿治疗试验(NETT)中随机接受LVRS或药物治疗的均匀性肺气肿患者进行比较。选择NETT参与者在年龄、基线肺功能测定和性别方面与EBC参与者相匹配。在基线、6个月和12个月时比较结果。
EBC组、NETT-LVRS组或药物治疗组患者在性别方面基线无显著差异。在基线时,EBC组和NETT-LVRS组患者的一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)或预测总肺容量(TLC)百分比无差异;与NETT-LVRS组相比,EBC组的残气量(RV)和一氧化碳肺弥散量(DLco)预测百分比更高(<0.001)。与药物治疗组相比,EBC组在6个月时FEV和RV改善更大,但TLC无改善。与药物治疗组相比,EBC组在12个月时FEV和RV仍显著改善。虽然所有三种治疗方法都改善了生活质量,但EBC或药物治疗组12个月时的生存率高于NETT-LVRS组。
对于已经接受最佳药物治疗的严重均匀性肺气肿和过度充气患者,EBC可能是一种潜在的治疗选择。