MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King's College London, NICU, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;178(1):105-110. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3254-3. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
Our aim was to compare the work of breathing (WOB) during synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) and heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) when used as post-extubation support in preterm infants. A randomised crossover study was undertaken of nine infants with a median gestational age of 27 (range 24-31) weeks and post-natal age of 7 (range 2-50) days. Infants were randomised to either SNIPPV or HHHFNC immediately following extubation. They were studied for 2 h on one mode and then switched to the other modality and studied for a further 2-h period. The work of breathing, assessed by measuring the pressure time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi), and thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) were determined at the end of each 2-h period. The infants' inspired oxygen requirement, oxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate were also recorded. The median PTPdi was lower on SNIPPV than on HHHFNC (232 (range 130-352) versus 365 (range 136-449) cmHO s/min, p = 0.0077), and there was less thoracoabdominal asynchrony (13.4 (range 8.5-41.6) versus 36.1 (range 4.3-50.4) degrees, p = 0.038).Conclusion: In prematurely born infants, SNIPPV compared to HHHFNC post-extubation reduced the work of breathing and thoracoabdominal asynchrony. What is Known: • The work of breathing and extubation failure are not significantly different in prematurely-born infants supported by HHHFNC or nCPAP. • SNIPPV reduces inspiratory effort and increases tidal volume and carbon dioxide exchange compared to nCPAP in prematurely born infants. What is New: • SNIPPV, as compared to HHHFNC, reduced the work of breathing in prematurely-born infants studied post-extubation. • SNIPPV, as compared to HHHFNC, reduced thoracoabdominal asynchrony in prematurely born infants studied post-extubation.
我们的目的是比较同步鼻塞间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)和加热湿化高流量鼻导管(HHHFNC)在早产儿拔管后支持中的呼吸做功(WOB)。对 9 名中位胎龄 27 周(范围 24-31 周)和出生后 7 天(范围 2-50 天)的婴儿进行了随机交叉研究。婴儿在拔管后立即随机分配接受 SNIPPV 或 HHHFNC。他们在一种模式下研究 2 小时,然后切换到另一种模式并再研究 2 小时。通过测量膈肌压力时间乘积(PTPdi)来评估呼吸做功,并在每个 2 小时结束时确定胸腹不同步(TAA)。还记录了婴儿的吸氧需求、氧饱和度、心率和呼吸频率。SNIPPV 的中位 PTPdi 低于 HHHFNC(232(范围 130-352)与 365(范围 136-449)cmHO s/min,p=0.0077),并且 TAA 较少(13.4(范围 8.5-41.6)与 36.1(范围 4.3-50.4)度,p=0.038)。结论:在早产儿中,与拔管后使用 HHHFNC 相比,SNIPPV 降低了呼吸做功和胸腹不同步。已知:• 在接受 HHHFNC 或 nCPAP 支持的早产儿中,呼吸做功和拔管失败没有显著差异。• SNIPPV 可降低早产儿的吸气努力,并增加潮气量和二氧化碳交换量,与 nCPAP 相比。新发现:• 与 HHHFNC 相比,SNIPPV 可降低拔管后早产儿的呼吸做功。• 与 HHHFNC 相比,SNIPPV 可降低拔管后早产儿的胸腹不同步。