Suppr超能文献

认知功能正常对照组、轻度认知障碍及痴呆亚型患者语义言语流畅性测试的定量和定性成分

Quanti-qualitative components of the semantic verbal fluency test in cognitively healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia subtypes.

作者信息

Wajman José Roberto, Cecchini Mario Amore, Bertolucci Paulo Henrique Ferreira, Mansur Letícia Lessa

机构信息

Behavioural Neurology Section, Hospital São Paulo, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) , São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo , São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(6):533-542. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1465426. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Abstract

This study is aimed to evaluating the underlying cognitive strategies used during Semantic Verbal Fluency (SVF) performance and comparing the differences between cognitively healthy controls (CHC), amnestic and amnestic-multiple domain mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI and a-md-MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). The cross-sectional study comprised 236 participants involving 78 CHC individuals, 33 a-MCI and 48 a-md-MCI, 39 AD, 22 LBD, and 16 bvFTD patients. Scores differed significantly when comparing CHC with dementia groups, showing medium to large variances. The best components in distinguishing between CHC and the dementia groups were the SVF-Total score and SVF-Cluster Size variables. CHC showed different performance in the SVF-Cluster Size variable compared with a-md-MCI, AD, and bvFTD; whereas, in the SVF-Mean Cluster Size, CHC differed from MCI's, AD, and LBD. The switching component displayed smaller capacity to differentiate between the clinical groups. The effect size was large comparing AD with bvFTD (1.267) and medium comparing AD with LBD (0.689) using the SVF-Cluster Size variable, but small using the other variables for the comparisons between dementia groups. Quanti-qualitative examination of the SVF may provide a valuable clue in distinguishing CHC from MCI and different dementia subtypes.

摘要

本研究旨在评估语义言语流畅性(SVF)测试过程中所使用的潜在认知策略,并比较认知健康对照组(CHC)、遗忘型和遗忘-多领域轻度认知障碍(a-MCI和a-md-MCI)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)、路易体痴呆(LBD)以及行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)之间的差异。这项横断面研究纳入了236名参与者,包括78名CHC个体、33名a-MCI和48名a-md-MCI患者、39名AD患者、22名LBD患者以及16名bvFTD患者。将CHC与痴呆组进行比较时,得分存在显著差异,显示出中等到较大的方差。区分CHC与痴呆组的最佳指标是SVF总分和SVF聚类大小变量。与a-md-MCI、AD和bvFTD相比,CHC在SVF聚类大小变量上表现不同;而在SVF平均聚类大小方面,CHC与MCI、AD和LBD存在差异。转换成分在区分临床组方面的能力较小。使用SVF聚类大小变量比较AD与bvFTD时效应量较大(1.267),比较AD与LBD时效应量中等(0.689),但在痴呆组之间的其他变量比较中效应量较小。对SVF进行定量-定性检查可能为区分CHC与MCI以及不同痴呆亚型提供有价值的线索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验