文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

射血分数/速度比值在无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后分层中的价值

Value of ejection fraction/velocity ratio in the prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.

作者信息

Antonini-Canterin Francesco, Di Nora Concetta, Cervesato Eugenio, Zito Concetta, Carerj Scipione, Ravasel Andreea, Cosei Iulian, Popescu Andreea Catarina, Popescu Bogdan Alexandru

机构信息

Ospedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione, Cardiologia Riabilitativa, Motta Di Livenza, Italy.

Cardiology Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2018 Dec;35(12):1909-1914. doi: 10.1111/echo.14182. Epub 2018 Oct 30.


DOI:10.1111/echo.14182
PMID:30376590
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ejection fraction/velocity ratio (EFVR) is a simple function-corrected index of aortic stenosis severity with a good correlation with aortic valve area measured using the Gorlin formula at cardiac catheterization. It is calculated by dividing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to 4 × (peak jet velocity) . OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the value of EFVR in predicting adverse events in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 216 asymptomatic patients with at least moderate aortic stenosis (AVA ≤ 1.5 cm ). The primary end-point was cardiovascular death or aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: There were 119 (55%) men and mean age was 68 ± 10 years. The mean follow-up time was 4.2 ± 1.6 years (median 4.3 years). During follow-up, the composite end-point of death or aortic valve replacement was reached in 105 patients (49%). Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, EFVR and valvulo-arterial impedance emerged as independent variables associated with outcome (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AVA < 1 cm ), EFVR ≤ 0.9 was associated with an increased hazard ratio for the composite end-point of mortality and aortic valve replacement (HR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.15-4.0, P = 0.017), even after adjusting for aortic valve area. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis, EFVR is useful for risk stratification. Our results suggest that incorporating EFVR in the evaluation of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis might help identify those who are most likely to benefit from early elective aortic replacement.

摘要

背景:射血分数/速度比值(EFVR)是一种简单的功能校正的主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度指标,与心导管检查时使用戈林公式测量的主动脉瓣面积具有良好的相关性。它通过将左心室射血分数(LVEF)除以4×(峰值射流速度)来计算。 目的:我们的目的是评估EFVR在预测无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者不良事件中的价值。 方法:我们分析了216例至少中度主动脉瓣狭窄(主动脉瓣面积≤1.5cm²)的无症状患者的临床和超声心动图数据。主要终点是心血管死亡或主动脉瓣置换。 结果:有119例(55%)男性,平均年龄为68±10岁。平均随访时间为4.2±1.6年(中位数4.3年)。随访期间,105例患者(49%)达到了死亡或主动脉瓣置换的复合终点。使用多变量Cox回归分析,EFVR和瓣膜-动脉阻抗成为与结局相关的独立变量(分别为P<0.001和P=0.001)。在严重主动脉瓣狭窄(主动脉瓣面积<1cm²)患者亚组中,即使在调整主动脉瓣面积后,EFVR≤0.9与死亡和主动脉瓣置换复合终点的风险比增加相关(风险比2.14,95%可信区间:1.15-4.0,P=0.017)。 结论:在无症状中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,EFVR有助于进行风险分层。我们的结果表明,将EFVR纳入无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者的评估中可能有助于识别那些最有可能从早期择期主动脉置换中获益的患者。

相似文献

[1]
Value of ejection fraction/velocity ratio in the prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.

Echocardiography. 2018-12

[2]
Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Coefficient for Predicting Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Outcomes: Direct Comparison With Aortic Valve Area.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019-1-9

[3]
Novel Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Am J Cardiol. 2018-7-15

[4]
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019-2-5

[5]
Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016-11

[6]
Incremental Prognostic Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic/Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Redo Aortic Valve Replacement.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017-6

[7]
Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.

Heart Surg Forum. 2017-7-20

[8]
Impact of flow and left ventricular strain on outcome of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Am J Cardiol. 2014-12-15

[9]
Aortic pulse wave velocity and its relationship with transaortic flow and gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Indian Heart J. 2020

[10]
Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Predictors of Mortality Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients.

Pathophysiology. 2022-3-9

[2]
Incremental prognostic role of left atrial reservoir strain in asymptomatic patients with moderate aortic stenosis.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021-6

[3]
Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Symptoms, Biochemical Markers, and Global Longitudinal Strain.

J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2020

[4]
Two Barricades in a Row Mixed Lesion of Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction and Aortic Stenosis: Finding the Culprit for Decision Making.

J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2020

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索