1 Division of Cardiology Shimada Municipal Hospital Shimada Japan.
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010198. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010198.
Background Data are scarce on the role of aortic valve area (AVA) to identify those patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high risk of adverse events. We sought to explore the prognostic impact of AVA in asymptomatic patients with severe AS in a large observational database. Methods and Results Among 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, the present study included 1309 conservatively managed asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The study patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on AVA (group 1: AVA >0.80 cm, N=645; group 2: 0.8 cm ≥AVA >0.6 cm, N=465; and group 3: AVA ≤0.6 cm, N=199). The prevalence of very severe AS patients (peak aortic jet velocity ≥5 m/s or mean aortic pressure gradient ≥60 mm Hg) was 2.0%, 5.8%, and 26.1% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The cumulative 5-year incidence of AVR was not different across the 3 groups (39.7%, 43.7%, and 39.9%; P=0.43). The cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure (a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization) was incrementally higher with decreasing AVA (24.1%, 29.1%, and 48.1%; P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of group 3 and group 2 relative to group 1 for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.56-3.11, P<0.001; and hazard ratio, 1.34, 95% CI, 1.01-1.78, P=0.04, respectively). Conclusions AVA ≤0.6 cm would be a useful marker to identify those high-risk patients with asymptomatic severe AS, who might benefit from early AVR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: www.umin.ac.jp . Unique identifier: UMIN000012140.
背景 关于主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)在识别无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中哪些患者发生不良事件风险较高的作用,相关数据较为匮乏。我们试图在一个大型观察性数据库中探讨无症状重度 AS 患者中 AVA 的预后影响。
方法和结果 在 CURRENT AS(严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者手术后和药物治疗的当代结局)注册登记处连续纳入的 3815 例重度 AS 连续患者中,本研究纳入了 1309 例接受保守治疗且左心室射血分数≥50%的无症状患者。根据 AVA 将研究患者分为 3 组(组 1:AVA>0.80cm,N=645;组 2:0.8cm≥AVA>0.6cm,N=465;组 3:AVA≤0.6cm,N=199)。组 1、2 和 3 中重度 AS 患者(峰值主动脉射流速度≥5m/s 或平均主动脉压力梯度≥60mmHg)的比例分别为 2.0%、5.8%和 26.1%。3 组间累积 5 年 AVR 发生率无差异(39.7%、43.7%和 39.9%;P=0.43)。随着 AVA 的降低,主要终点(主动脉瓣相关死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合终点)的累积 5 年发生率逐渐升高(24.1%、29.1%和 48.1%;P<0.001)。在校正混杂因素后,组 3 和组 2 相对于组 1 的主要终点风险比仍有显著升高(风险比,2.21,95%CI,1.56-3.11,P<0.001;和风险比,1.34,95%CI,1.01-1.78,P=0.04)。
结论 AVA≤0.6cm 可能是识别无症状重度 AS 高危患者的有用标志物,这些患者可能从早期 AVR 中获益。
UMIN000012140。